393 Comments
User's avatar
NothingButNet's avatar

Excellent post! 👍 Didn’t realize that CJ Roberts had a left wing wife. That explains his performance as the spineless eunuch of SCOTUS. Sure hope you’re right about indictments, prosecutions and incarcerations coming soon. I’m getting too old to wait much longer! 🙏🙏🙏

Ben R's avatar

And here I was thinking he was a name on someone's nefarious list of clients playing hide the pickle in an underage victim.

I suspect this is still the case.

Amy Barret has the corrupt RC connection and the commie pope.

Lugh's avatar

So why did Trump, both an ardent patriot and an intellectual genius, appoint her?

Scott's avatar

Bad Intel. He was picking from federalist approved judges - big mistake and likely one he won't repeat. Article three project judges from here on out.

A. Saboia's avatar

And btw what Trump is waiting for to initiate an inquiry whether recent appointments to the courts were made by autopen??? He could maybe replace at least one of those DEI appointments. And this has now become crucial!

Ben R's avatar
Jul 7Edited

Ketanji Brown is the obvious choice: last hired, first fired.

She must be the dumbest Supreme ever installed.

Cankerpuss's avatar

She doesn't even know what a woman is. My 15 year old daughter would be a better justice than that brain dead individual.

Phyuck Yiu's avatar

Yeah, sure, it's always "Bad Intel, with you Cultists.

SheilaB's avatar

'Bad Intel' led him to his world-leading Operation Warp Speed too. He hasn't discovered the Good Intel yet on that one, 6 years down the line, because he's still claiming to be Vaxx Daddy who saved eleventy billion lives.

Scott's avatar

Well like I said, he got two right and one wrong. Not horrible. I'd like to see a couple more picks.

Ben R's avatar

Best of the worst options D'uh.

Don Burgundy's avatar

Amy Commie Barrett disgusts me

Cankerpuss's avatar

"spineless eunuch of SCOTUS" Voting right along side the crazy wamin of the SCOTUS. Notice how the issue of babies born here being automatically granted citizen ship was unanimously supported by the ugly hags, including fake conservative ACB. Women shouldn't be in positions like this. They are too damned emotional, illogical, hormonal, whatever you want to call it.

Sherellmybell's avatar

Women may be emotional but men are egotistical and dense. I don't think women in positions of power have f'd things up any worse than the male population which got us to this messed up state in the FIRST place. Just saying.

Cankerpuss's avatar

I never said men were perfect. Just that they were not as easily swayed by emotions as the wamin are. Your points are all valid.

Ben R's avatar
Jul 8Edited

Broad brushstrokes.

My wife, a woman, is pissed about this terrible decision.

I would bet money Mooch is ecstatic about it.

Hey, Mooch, what is that swinging around under that pantsuit pair of pants? Er, never mind; I do not want to know.

Cankerpuss's avatar

Of course there are outliers to all broad brushstrokes. I readily acknowledge that. My wife too is not happy with the way the wamin voted on the SCOTUS thus enabling further cultural decay of America. There are some intelligent, beautiful, feminine, man loving women out there. No doubt. But by and large the fairer sex has left itself in ruins.

I don't know who "mooch" is. You aren't talking about "Big Mike" Obama are you?

Ben R's avatar
Jul 8Edited

Mooch is, in fact, Big Mike or Michael, as Barry has called it several times

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1ipUvD2IT4&list=PLUNENKPEQ5hmkEuTgEZbDMqDsZo7r2lBz

Subdolphin's avatar

Feel ya Nothing...But I'd bet money that, with the exception of Justice Clarence Thomas, most if not all other justices have leftward, deep state-comfortable partners.

William's avatar

Not Alito either!

Scott's avatar

There are four justices that are reliably conservative - Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch. The rest are a compromised disaster. Trump got two right and one wrong. He won't make another mistake. Let's hope we can get Brown removed for fraud and get Roberts to either resign or removed.

Cankerpuss's avatar

And four of those disaster justices are of the female persuasion (at least we are told they are female, Sotomayor and Kagan, well, I wouldn't want to meet those things in a dark alley).

Three and Two's avatar

FYI - There are 6 Elephants and only 3 Donkeys:

Thomas - Poppy Bush

Alito, Kavanaugh & Roberts - Bush the Lesser

Kagan & Sotomayer - Obummer

Coney-Barrett & Gorsuch - Trump 45

Brown-Jackson - Cabbage

Andrea405's avatar

Kavanaugh was Trump 45 as well. Who can forget his supposed "almost rape" at a graduation party in 1983? What a farce the dems tried to pull! If it wasn't for the RINO Collins finally voting with the GOP instead of her usual with the other side, there would be no Kavanaugh. And yeah, he votes usually on the conservative side, even though he likes beer.

Mitch's avatar

all conservative SC appointees get the Democrat treatment, usually rape charges based on nothing, but if that seems untenable, they'll Bork them.

Damn the torpedoes's avatar

I knew, through you, that Roberts was best buds with Eisen, which explained not only Obamacare but his latest soul-sucking decision on birthright citizenship. Amy C was a plant when Trump was being manhandled by the deep-state cronies in his first term. I hope we win the midterms, so accountability can yet shine. I’d like to see Trump pack the court, or maybe “pad” would be a better term, with 2 more young conservatives, like Mike Brennan in the 7th. No more girls, please. They cannot be trusted. Too bad Thune couldn’t fall off Mt. Rushmore or something.

Dutchmn007's avatar

I’d be for complete repeal of the 19th Amendment @ this point; not all of course - but the vast majority of - women vote based on emotion not critical thinking. Look how they swooned over JFK, Clinton, & BHO. Swooning is not critical thinking.

Gwennie's avatar

Women are extremophiles: statistically, the most conservative voting group is married women with children and the least are single women. So men, do your part: marry a good woman and have some children.

Lugh's avatar

Most of the liberal women end up divorcing their husbands. So marrying is no fix, plus you lose half of what you own if not more.

Women shouldn't be voting. And they shouldn't get the children in most cases. People who break their oaths aren't going to be good parents.

Cankerpuss's avatar

The founders had it right when they denied women the right to vote. My wife, a "good woman" described by Gwennie above, agrees that women shouldn't be voting.

Most people shouldn't be voting. Only those who pay net taxes and have a financial investment in the government should be voting. Period.

Gwennie's avatar

I said "a good woman."

Lugh's avatar

There's simply not enough of them any more. Men are so much better people at least now, maybe always. Perhaps women were kept down for a very good reason.

Cankerpuss's avatar

Men are awakening to the bullshit double standard foisted upon them by the feminist lesbians. The bullshit is coming to an end and most of these hateful hags can't find any man to screw them. Much less marry them. The days of feminists are coming to an end as men are rebelling and rejecting women altogether.

I'm not saying this is a good thing or healthy for society. It's just what it is. After decades of abuse at the hands of the heavily female leaning court systems, young men today are simply refusing to marry. Refusing to make babies with these hags. Refusing to give up his life and money to these tatted up facial pierced cows. The cows know it too. Hence the anger, rage and ugliness that permeates what was once considered the "fairer sex."

My older son went out and found himself a little Mexicana telling me that white American women are bat shit crazy. He's right. The feminist reign of terror is coming to an end.

Case in point. New movie, "supergirl" is a complete and utter dismal flop. Nobody wants to watch a snotty petite ugly woman with super powers beating up dudes left and right. Nobody. Not even the lesbians.

God created the woman after the man, to be help-meet unto him. Not to rule over him. The natural order has been up-ended and must be restored and will be restored.

DQ's avatar

I must say, as a very conservative woman since my first vote, even though I grew up in a Democrat family, I’m very much offended that too many here think I do not have the intelligence or capacity for critical thinking.

Margot Russell/ The 30 Percent's avatar

Touché DQ. The misogynists are crawling out of the woodwork. This kind of crap is what created feminism in the first place. And yes, I am a conservative who has been voting that way since my twenties. I just call things as I see them.

Scott's avatar

It's always dangerous to generalize. There are of course many extremely intelligent women who can think. The question is, what is the percentage versus men?

DQ's avatar

It does seem that many of the commenters decrying women voters are also “generalizing”. Just saying.

Lugh's avatar

In other words, you have to generalize (also called thinking), be it "dangerous" (wtf?) or not.

Ben R's avatar

In otherwords any slop will do for Lugh.

The king of slop.

Scott's avatar

That's interesting and probably true. So the real problem is men? Society (the pigrats) have been stacked against them for a long time.

Gwennie's avatar

No, the real problem, as I see it is that as a society we don't have any reliable standards on what makes a good, healthy adult woman and a good healthy adult man., and a good healthy adult relationship. Men and women are natural allies and need one another. And most women and men do best as part of a family and community. Havng torched the extended family and community model we are trying to figure out what the replacement is, and so far, the answer is chaos.

wkenn's avatar

Interesting... Elizabeth Warren is an outspoken leader of the 'abolish the Electoral College' movement.

Ben R's avatar

Only because, with the ability to cheat, they would win every Presidential election.

Cankerpuss's avatar

And they have no knowledge of American history and why the electoral college was created and how it protects the interests of the little states like Wyoming, Alaska and many others. That shit faced cow has no business being in the US Senate. Period.

Gary Edwards's avatar

My mom swooned over Reagan.

Cankerpuss's avatar

I clearly remember my old man having a fence line conversation with a cute little neighbor gal he was a little smitten with. They were talking politics. She admitted she had voted for Bill Clinton. When my father asked her why she had voted for Clinton her response was "because he's so handsome." I remember it. Clearly.

And that, my friends is why women should not be voting.

Margot Russell/ The 30 Percent's avatar

Excuse me while I literally throw up this fine morning. You’re more like a canker sore on the earth. I know a lot of great conservative women who love their families, contribute greatly to their well being, and are intelligent, reasonable people who are towing the line in a world that has given up on families. I have a litany of names to call you, but somehow I sense you’re not intelligent enough to see yourself clearly. And by the way, the number of male leaders in sex scandals is beyond reproach. They can’t keep their pants on because “She was so cute.”

Cankerpuss's avatar

Bring it on, bitch.

" I know a lot of great conservative women who love their families."

Like Amy Coney Barrett who just betrayed the United States of America by siding with Sotomayor, Kagan and Brown?

Or like the bitch in Colorado, Lauren Boebert, who left her family and was kicked out of movie theater because she was letting her boyfriend at the time fondle her giant fake boobs in public.

You women have lost your minds and are no longer worthy of American males or any chivalry. You're all fake. Spending your days injecting botox into your lips, plastering you faces with paint, putting salt sacks in your breasts and then wearing clothing that is way too tight for your fat tattooed bodies.

I've never said men were saints or angels. Men are just as bad as women but women were always the gate keepers of morality and they, like the US Congress, have pissed away any moral authority they once had and society has gone to shit since. Now they are relegated to screwing what ever piece of crap dude will have them, get pregnant, and then go abort the poor innocent baby to avoid the consequences of her evil choices. Yeah, the dude is bad but it is the woman who chooses to spread her legs to him and let him in. Get it?

When women are sent to the front lines to be cannon fodder with the young men then, only then will I look at them as being even close to equal. Until then, shut your mouths and be grateful for the posh and cushy lives we men have provided for you.

And, by the way, I have never heard a man state proudly that he voted for a female candidate because "she was hot."

Lugh's avatar

Women are the gatekeepers of morality when we make them as such. Left to their own devices, they are wanna be Kardashians for the most part.

Lugh's avatar

But Nixon was your first love. Who can forget Nixon and Billy Graham whispering in the oval office about the Jewish takeover, with Dick recording every word. Now Jr has joined the Zionists betraying his own father.

elysianfield's avatar

"But Nixon was your first love."

Well...Goldwater, maybe.

Gary Edwards's avatar

I'm not even sure his wife was attracted to sweaty Dick.

elysianfield's avatar

Gary,

She had simple tastes...even wore a simple cloth coat.

Dutchmn007's avatar

Her voting should have been based on what Reagan was going to do to benefit the country & American voters in the wake of all the Carter malaise.

Gary Edwards's avatar

Well she did become a life long republican after that, but as for why she started, it was "He was so handsome!"

DQ's avatar

Since I was just under the voting age and could not vote, they were not completely wrong on JFK . I do not vote for looks or personality but on policies. Looks and personality are transitory, policy is more lasting.

JuQu's avatar

Ha! Let’s be fair and use poll testing instead. Here’s hoping that you will pass, Dutcgmn007.

John Schrauth's avatar

The day RBG passed, Thune, as McConnell's flunky, called the White House and literally pleaded for ACB to be nominated. All of the recent information makes CJ Roberts appear to be the ultimate Unipartier. What's next? Speeches in favor of Agenda 2030 at the World Economic Forum?

Cankerpuss's avatar

"No more girls, please. They cannot be trusted." Amen, bruddah. Men are bad enough but women in positions of power can't think clearly.

Vegan Shark's avatar

Any legal tactic to move the Supreme Court's center of gravity rightward will be welcome at this point. But that's a stopgap. Structural reform has to follow if the US political system is to be released from the Court's python grip.

The best means would be a constitutional amendment surgically removing its power to negate the will of Congress and the people by declaring laws unconstitutional. No such power is in the Constitution but it has long been assumed anyway. In the history of the practice, it's hard to see it's benefited the country overall.

Of course amending the Constitution is notoriously hard and time consuming, as it should be. Perhaps an amendment going against centuries of precedent would be easier to pass if it contained a "soft" fix. Some possibilities:

Leave the Court with the power to rule on only new legislation, not what has been on the books for dog's years.

Give the Court the power only to delay the application of laws for a period, say one year, not permanently. During that holding time, Congress or a state legislature would have the authority to "re-think" the law they've passed. They could themselves overturn it, but would not be forced to vote a second time.

Require a simple majority of state legislators or state attorneys general to approve the Court's unconstitutionality rulings before they can go into effect.

Limit a judge's time on the Court to, say, 10 years with some kind of mechanism for extending it another 10 if it meets a certain test -- perhaps Congressional hearings and a vote like in the original confirmation.

I'm sure legal minds could come up with additional, or better, proposals. But we have to do something about this divine right of Black Robes to make policy with no comebacks.

Cankerpuss's avatar

The SCOTUS was never intended to negate the will of Congress, as you so aptly stated. The SCOTUS held the responsibility of interpreting the law as to the merits of the Constitution. Originally, all the SCOTUS could do was send the law back to the Congress with a request to re-consider certain parts that didn't meet Constitutional muster. The SCOTUS was originally housed in the basement of the US Capitol. They should never have built that god-awful greek temple to the SCOTUS, putting them on the same level as the Constitutionally mandated sovereign, the Congress. They are NOT equals. The Judicial Branch as described in the Constitution, has the least amount of language applied thereto than any other branch of government. So how is it today considered equal to the other two branches?

The SCOTUS has literally morphed into a pseudo legislative body. The SCOTUS has no right or authority to determine whether birthright citizenship should exist. The SCOTUS has no right or authority to determine whether birthright citizenship should NOT exist. It's not up the SCOTUS. It's up to the US Congress. The five idiots sitting on the SCOTUS right now know less about the US Constitution than the hairy pimple growing on my ass.

The US Congress, a dismal and pathetic failure of the US Constitution, has pissed away all of its authority and sovereignty granted to it by the US Constitution. Instead all they do is hold worthless committee hearings so the members thereof can get their soundbites and "likes" on shithole social media sites like Tik-Tok. Members of Congress today don't even know or understand the authority the Constitution grants the US Congress or that they are the sovereign.

Pathetic. Truly and utterly pathetic.

Vegan Shark's avatar

"The SCOTUS was originally housed in the basement of the US Capitol." LOL. Sounds about right!

"They should never have built that god-awful greek temple to the SCOTUS, putting them on the same level as the Constitutionally mandated sovereign, the Congress." As one with classical leanings, I approve the building design. But the Supreme Court should be turfed out of it. Maybe the Court could be re-installed in the godawful Kennedy Center, adjacent to the parking garage.

Cankerpuss's avatar

Having toured the US Capitol, twice, the old SCOTUS chambers are still there in the basement (at least they were 15 years ago). They are quite nice to behold and appropriate for the council of the so-called "Supremes."

Don't get me wrong, the SCOTUS's temple is a beautiful structure (strictly speaking architecturally) but the SCOTUS isn't worthy of inhabiting such a structure. In stating that it was god-awful I was referring to the group of nasties that it currently houses and what the structure currently represents. Then again, I don't believe the Congress is worthy of inhabiting the beautiful US Capitol. I think Congress should be housed in an old open air football stadium :)

Thanks, VS! Have a good day.

BlueSky101's avatar

Hey, don't characterize all women based on the SC deep state girls!

DQ's avatar

Ha ha ha…. I totally agree on Thune, Senator of my birth state.

Madjack's avatar

From your lips(or essay) to Gods ears. Hang them all.

John Schrauth's avatar

Is keelhauling still a thing?

Yirgach's avatar

Unfortunately the demise of wooden ships has greatly limited the availability of barnacles growing on the ship's hull. This kinda takes the sting out of keelhauling.

Lugh's avatar

Oh, was that the main pain of it?

Yirgach's avatar

Yeah, that and drowning. Used to sail when I was younger and we would just lay the boat over on a tack so the siderails were in the water, lean over the side and scrape off the barnacles. Then turn back and repeat on the other side. They were extremely sharp and could cut like razor blades.

Lugh's avatar

Mein Gott! What a world. Ditto many Pacific island "paradises" in terms of the rocks.

Thea McGinnis's avatar

I support public caning.

John Schrauth's avatar

I heartily concur!

Inisfad's avatar

I’m glad Mr. Kunstler points to Sheldon Snook, who, ‘rumor has it’ was the person who actually leaked the Alito decision undoing Roe v Wade, and thereafter, VERY quietly left the employ of Justice Roberts. Just a bit of an interesting connection there, and makes one wonder what skeletons Roberts may have in his closet that makes him so susceptible to Lawfare activists. In the meantime, I’d also like to add that while it may be Obama etal whose policies are behind much of what we are seeing, he and his cohorts do not have the wherewithal to actually finance much of the funded unrest. It’s good to hear that a light (and investigation) is shining on Neville Singham who, along with his Code Pink wife, is a billionaire, living in China and attached to the CCP, and apparently connected to much of this funding

Ben R's avatar

Obama bought into the Blood Gore carbon credit exchange at the ground floor and has managed to become a billionaire; he does, in fact, have the money to throw at things now.

Gone are the days when he needed to be bribed by Tony Rezko with plots of land worth 500,000 to add on to his Chicago mansion.

JuQu's avatar

Probably will let other guys throw theirs first( maybe always), though.

Ben R's avatar

I had the same thought, but I'm just pointing out that he has been paid off for his attempt to destroy America.

Hugh Wayne Black's avatar

Obama would have done it free of charge. The payoffs were just perks.

Inisfad's avatar

We throw around the term ‘billionaire’ rather easily. Obama is not a billionaire, and while his net worth is not publicized, it’s estimated at around $70 million. Crumbs when compared to legitimate billionaires like Singham and Soros.

Ben R's avatar
Jul 6Edited

This was reported several years ago when the carbon credit scam was big, but it looks like with a Trumpian ascendancy into the White House, that "business venture" has flopped.

Which makes me happy; hopefully it bankrupts Al Gore and the Obamas.

My how time and fortunes fly!

https://capitalresearch.org/article/al-gores-carbon-empire-cashing-in-on-climate-change/

John Schrauth's avatar

The Gores had a very interesting "relationship" with Armand Hammer dating from the time Gore's father was also a US Senator. Significant quantities of Occidental Petroleum shares if I understand it correctly. Old Al isn't going broke anytime soon.

Obama's payoff was via huge contracts for programming from media companies. Has anyone seen any of this high priced programming?

Ben R's avatar
Jul 6Edited

The Netflix garbage is the only one I am aware of, and no, I don't want to throw something through my wife's TV.

The rest of the post makes sense. Mister, I hate petroleum; I have a fortune off the industry and now pretend to have nothing to do with it.

Typical Democrat nonsense.

Always knew Al Gore was an absolute piece of shit.

Sammy Snake's avatar

Yes. They bribe these bureaucrats with the folding money in their front pocket. Probably less in Europe as those plants are terrified at the loss of sinecure. Right down to their police forces.

Tommy L Hoffman's avatar

HOW MUCH DARK MONEY IS NOT REFLECTED ON HIS BALANCE SHEET

Inisfad's avatar

A billion is one thousand million. So you think that 900 million is secreted somewhere? Seriously??

Lugh's avatar

What about Sheldon Snook?

Inisfad's avatar

Sheldon Snook is Mary McCord’s husband. Mary McCord is central to all the Lawfare we’ve seen.

Lugh's avatar

What is his net worth? How much has been attained by his wife and how much by his own honest thievery?

Gwennie's avatar

Imagine how evil you have to be to name your innocent newborn 'Sheldon Snook'.

William's avatar

Sounds like a worthless garbage fish. Smells horrendously worse!

Impatient's avatar

I don't have details but my understanding is Roberts is somehow involved in pedophilia. Maybe he is a pedo or maybe he was honey potted with an underage prostitute. I don't know. Supposedly RBG wanted to lower the age of consent - drastically. I couldn't find any of her writing supportive of that theory but maybe I didn't look hard enough.

Cassander's avatar

I certainly agree that Iran has "the option of dropping their jihad fixation and acting like a normal nation", but doesn't this depend, just a tiny bit, on Israel dropping their amalek fixation and acting like a normal nation? I thought so.

ezinmn's avatar

No, Iran's jihad fixation is independent of how Israel decides to handle events like October 7, 2023. Israel will always maintain the right to defend itself against aggressors, even if they hide among the citizens.

SheilaB's avatar

"[H]ow Israel decides to handle events like October 7, 2023" included ignoring written documented warnings that the event was about to happen, claiming they were 'surprised' at the crossing of the most surveilled border in the world where a gnat could not penetrate without being seen, and ordering their forces to stand down for hours to let it happen, so that they could 'justify' their response, which has been the aggressive slaughter of women, children and babies, plus wholesale destruction to allow Jared Kushner and his pals to build some impressive real estate with all smart-city open-air-prison tech. That's leaving aside that Israel had been funding Hamas through Qatar, with the specific aim of preventing a 2-state solution (literally claimed openly by Netanyahu in the Knesset).

The world (i.e. the world that isn't beholden to MSM) has seen the photos* and footage of IDF soldiers sporting the clothes and underwear of murdered women in their destroyed homes and the toys of murdered children.

All part of the dialectics. Zionism is in the descendent; another force is in the ascendent. It will be a force claiming to be 'good'. People will be fooled. Again.

* 👇

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjN95U2QPRE

NY Nanny's avatar

Another Monday morning treat from the inestimable Mr. Kunstler. Glad I read it before I went to go for the black pills.

It's true that "The mills of the law grind slowly" but they also grind exceedingly fine.

OTOH/IMHO's avatar

I've been watching them over 50 years and I can tell you thy grind a lot more slowly than finely. The decimation of the right to privacy(we see people's email transcripts in the news daily, for example, and there is every reason to suspect phone and on-line comments are monitored),of protection against unreasonable searches and seizure, of the right to peacefully protest(as in a nurse cited for exemplary care of veterans being murdered in cold blood by ICE), and for that matter the institution of fiat money soon to morph into digital "money" (!!), unprecedented state police powers, and concentration of banking, mass media and the internet itself is almost breathtaking. As unfortunate as a character like Luigi Mangione is, one wonders if the only option is millions of people operating as solitary guerrillas in the war against the monsters running operations.

Phyuck Yiu's avatar

Exactly, the Rule of Law doesn't grind (at all) for the Ruling Elite and their lackeys of choice.

Anyone promoting otherwise is a knowing liar.

Phyuck Yiu's avatar

Idolatry is next to sodomy.

God is not mocked.

el puma's avatar

Now THAT'S a post! Good stuff JHK! Keep going! 👏 👏 👏 👏

Te Burt's avatar

Happy 250th Birthday, y'all. I bawled over all the patriotic stuff and was prouder than -- well, pick your own avatar. Cheered flyovers, speeches (Trump delivered a good one at Mt. Rushmore), and, God BLESS 'em! Ships under sail up the Hudson! OMG! I remember sail and creaking lines and hot decks and that smell of the open sea . . . . I would reincarnate backwards (who's to say we don't) for the chance to walk the decks and climb the ropes and watch the sails fill again! Yeah, we got Mamdani, Walz, Newsom, that bald dude and all his frantic buds, and a slew of other idiots with grandiose and fake ambitions hiding greed, nastiness and pathetic egos. Tere's another bunch working hard to keep us righteous and whole. Honestly, given the Biden era, I expected worse than we've gotten so far, but summer ain't done, and midterms are breathing down our necks and there's ALWAYS somebody trying to shove BS up our arses. Tighten, watch your six out there - crazies abound - and keep the faith. Remember: We The People are the first words of the Constitution. We the People are the Republic.

Ben R's avatar

I spent the 4th on the Naval Airstation good times and Fireworks!

An old fashioned 4th to be sure small town style.

No stupid drone shows!

Te Burt's avatar

Thanks for your service.

William's avatar

Must be Mira Mar

🇺🇸

Ben R's avatar

No, that is a Marine Air Base now, much further north.

Middle of nowhere, San Joaquin Valley, hot as hell.

William's avatar

Yikes, I feel for you! Lived in that hellhole couple of years, so glad to move out!

I grew up Camp Pend/Fallbrook. My father and grandfather, both retired USMC, rip Semper Fi), took us down to MM twice a year to watch the incredible Blue Angels! Mindblower that never gets old!!

Te Burt's avatar

Thanks for your service. This 4th, it means more than ever.

Lugh's avatar
Jul 6Edited

The people have turned against Trump because of his bellicose idiocy and obsequiousness to warmongering Israel. He believed Bibi that the conquest of Iran would be a cake walk. How stupid is that?

Te Burt's avatar

You sure about that? Cause nobody I know has turned against Trump. We all knew exactly what he is from the get-go - and we celebrate it.

Phyuck Yiu's avatar

Your cultist, pathological, idiocy knows no bounds.

Te Burt's avatar

Tsk, tsk, such language.

William's avatar

Hezbollah awaits your loyalty and anticipates with great excitement using you for cannon fodder! Please leave, join your communist minions of freedom haters.

Dave Campbell's avatar

SO DISAPPOINTED in Roberts. He can no longer hide his true intentions after this latest ruling. Let's hope his extrajudicial shenanigans sets him up for removal from office. We haven't had a crooked supreme taken out in a long time.

Phyuck Yiu's avatar

When was Roberts ever hiding his Uniparty worthlessness?

Bill of Rights's avatar

Newborn babies may be U.S. citizens but that shouldn’t confer citizenship on any of their relatives. If they go back to their relatives’ homeland (which they must because that’s where their family lives) they become citizens of that land and not ours. No dual citizenship.

Freedom 4 conservatives's avatar

You are absolutely correct. There is nothing in the Constitution or Laws that prevents an illegal alien from being deported, even if his/her offspring is a U.S. Citizen. Leftists would bleat about "breaking up families" if that happened. Well, too fucking bad--maybe the illegal aliens should have thought about that possibility before they snuck into the U.S. to squeeze out a puppy to be a parasite on working American citizens.

In the meantime, President Trump could use his Executive Powers to absolutely close the U.S borders to ANY entry until the SAVE Act is passed and on his desk for signature, and until all illegal aliens are removed from the U.S. That would be a drastic move, with significant repercussions, but the time for timidity is over.

President Trump also made clear in his Independence Day speeches that Communists and their sympathizers and enablers are going to be excised from the United States. Working, patriotic American citizens have had enough of leftist bullshit--leftists today being a group of lazy, parasitic, non-productive clowns with a seriously criminal and violent bent in plain sight for anyone who objectively looks. Intelligent leftists--I realize that is an oxymoron--should hope that it is the American government and justice system that holds them accountable because, if the government and justice system doesn't hold them accountable, law-abiding, working American citizens will--and those citizens will do it in ways that are DEADLY serious.

Ben R's avatar

Nothing good will happen until the welfare giveaways cease!

Most of these unwanted people will self-deport if they suddenly run out of money and have no gimmes happening.

10-40 million people pulling up stakes and wandering off into the sunset will send the cost of housing, food, power, and most of all car insurance right into the basement.

Can't even begin to describe how tired I am of the baracho 12-pack type driving around in the beater pickup truck changing lanes without looking, or signaling.

Gwennie's avatar

Read yesterday that deportations spiked recently to 10,000 week/ 2,000 per week day. Sounds like a lot until you calculate how long it wuld take to deport 30 million people...41 years.

Impatient's avatar

I am watching for the illegal at work to get deported. The city of Albuquerque hired illegals who didn't speak English and couldn't actually do the jobs they were hired for. I am also waiting to hear from my coworker whose baby mama is illegal. He complained to me when his son lost his EBT card. I refrained from asking him why he believed I and other taxpayers should pay to feed his child. I can barely feed me and my cats. I didn't bring his ex girlfriend's anchor baby into the world. I really want to bitch slap people sometimes.

Gwennie's avatar

When my Mom was sick I ended up doing all my shopping at night. You wouldn't believe how Krogers and Wal-Mart fill at night with illegal aliens who overflow their buggies with piles of meat and seemingly every shopping whim they have. When America was flush with cash people didn't much notice but now we all do. Checking out next to illegals are regular working Americans amazed at those piles of meat...we all know it is compliments of the US taxpayer...who can't afford the same for their own families.

Cankerpuss's avatar

So true, I was in the grocery line and in front of me were portly fat couple of spanish speaking people from somewhere south of the US border. In their cart was at least 10 packages of chicken breasts, pork roasts, pork chops and other meat product. The meat they were buying totalled more than my entire grocery budget. How is it that someone who can't speak a lick of English, working menial labor jobs, can afford to buy food in that manner?

Ben R's avatar

No taxes on an under-the-table job, living 20 to a house, and on every possible welfare program they could scam into.

At one point under the Obama regime they were handing out $5,000 a month on ebt cards to these people and that was per adult.

Ben R's avatar

Which is why they need to be made very uncomfortable so they leave on their own time, dime, and power.

Sammy Snake's avatar

Yes. We are going to have to make some hard decisions and simply take our lumps.

OTOH/IMHO's avatar

Points well taken, but take care when wielding the brush to tar "Communists." First of all, it was never illegal to be one unless calling for the violent overthrow of government. One of Hitler's less endearing acts was banning unions and you will find that a lot of the Commie-bashing has more to do with anti-unionism than anything else.

OTOH/IMHO's avatar

Citizenship is not conferred on children born to foreign embassy workers legally living in the U.S. and certainly should not apply to those born to ones living here illegally.

Howard Skillington's avatar

It’s good to see Vladimir Putin acknowledged here as America’s de-facto ally, whether unreconstructed cold warriors like it or not. Recall that Mr. Trump advocated normalized relationships with Russia when he first ran for president in 2016. He’s probably lucky he survived saying so but, alas, his proposal did not prevail.

Notwithstanding the millions of credulous who started waving little blue and yellow flags the moment they were instructed to do so, Russia’s Special Military Operation in Ukraine was instigated by the west and quite necessary to defend his nation’s sovereignty. As ludicrous as it is for the pipsqueak states of Western Europe to declare their intention to go to war with Russia, the missiles that they have been foolishly lobbing deep into Russia, including Moscow, itself, are no laughing matter. Russia would be entirely justified to respond in kind with strikes into Berlin, London, and other cities, but Putin realizes that reciprocation would probably ignite WWIII.

We should all be thankful that Vladimir Putin is the grownup in the room. His preternatural restraint harms his domestic standing, but keeps us safe at night – at least for now. Unfortunately, we have forfeited his nation’s friendship with our meddling in West Asia, and he has reluctantly come to understand that his nation’s future security and prosperity lie there, instead.

dplainview's avatar

Q1: Recall those "proof of vaccination" cards necessary before entry? 


Q2: Why not pregnancy testing* 10 days before entry?

Planned Parenthood and like minded, might use their streams of funding to set up "on demand" abortion units at points of entry.

* This would also apply for all that "identify" as female mammals.

Leara's avatar

Another excellent analysis!

Personal anecdote: In the late 2010's I worked for Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman... an institution thick with incessant, subtle and obvious jostling for power, and rife with thinly veiled threats, obsequiousness and hypocrisy. Disgusting, but no different from other international law firms.

JuQu's avatar

Just a couple things:

ACB was a DEI hire too, at least, sorta.

Roberts was appointed by Bush the lesser. Need we say more.

Roberts is in charge of those birds in black robes in the D.C. ( and other places) federal court. Never a reprimand, or comment from him about those rulings/ blockings.

Gwennie's avatar

Here in Georgia, right now in Fulton county, hundreds of investigators are going over the 2020 election results and the details surrounding the Big Cheat. May the evidence be irrefutable.

John Schrauth's avatar

A court filing in the Dominion case last week showed over 20,000 more votes than eligible voters in your county alone.

Garry Blankenship's avatar

Our master wordsmith uses the word bigly and I'm lovin it. Iran is the neighbor's annoying, small yipping dog. Death to America, we will smite the big serpent, bla, bla, wolf wolf. One would think the last couple months would have educated Iran just a bit, but that annoying yipping remains. They cannot stop poking the bear. Significant collateral damage may be the only way to finish this. Just keep taking pieces off the board in the form of Iran's varying infrastructures, until their situation is better understood.