"A macrosocial cluster B crisis is ripping this nation apart because Leftism has hijacked the minds of progressive females who then LARP out dangerous Gnostic heroic delusions." — JD Haltigan
"When the arraignments begin, the derangements will ebb. Just watch and see."
We've been waiting years for something substantive to occur. It had better happen soon as this madness cannot go on much longer. Indeed, it may be too late.
The statute of limitations has been running on much of what was most obviously criminal. I am far from optimistic that those deserving prosecution will face it.
RICO? For example Nancy Pelosi spoke out about J6 the other day about Trump causing the Chaos that day. She thus updated the statute of limitations to 5 more years should she be indicted.
Think of it like the Final Destination movies. There is a specific end determined for you, and you may dodge it for awhile, but eventually it will find you. So, yeah, they're dodging their final destination now, but eventually, by their own hands, it will find them. You have to wait and watch. It's always the little, seemingly insignificant things that bring down the giants.
Not a lawyer, but I’ve read in several articles that because these crimes are all linked to the conspiracy to take Trump down, which they are, then the statute of limitations does not apply…seditious conspiracy will be the overriding charge, it seems.
That’s why Bondi was a terrible choice to start with and must be fired. The Comey/James case botched deliberately to let them skate. Why President Trump is okay with this? I wish I knew.
The worst. Bondi is to the DOJ what Barr, Bolton, Milley, Sessions, Wray Haspel, Fauci,Comey, McMaster, Pence, Kerner, Hill were to the first Trump admin combined.
The shooting in Minneapolis has generated a great deal of interest, far and wide.
I just got a message from a friend who is currently on a fishing boat in the south Pacific and he heard about the shooting from locals in a drinking establishment after he got ino port a few days ago. Apparently it's been the talk of the village. A few hours ago he sent me this unsolicited comment:
"I had independently formulated the view from analysing the footage from multiple angles and cameras that Ross had positioned himself (just) in front of the vehicle as it moved back so that he could shoot the driver as soon as it started to move forwards. He is drawing (but not aiming) his gun as he steps in front of the reversing vehicle. The trajectory of the car is of course towards him as it begins to move but moving forward from a reverse means that the actually velocity of the (accelerating) car is quite low.
At this point he does the classic matador footwork firing down and at an angle through the windscreen. He then completes this classic footwork pivot (I have trained and used this many times with non projectile weapons - technically this is a 'nice' application) and fires twice into the drivers side window as the (now faster) car moves by. He then yells "fucking bitch" at the woman who he has shot and walks down after the car to check the outcome. His team then prevents immediate medical help from a passing doctor ensuring that the victim will bleed out before anyone else gets close to her.
The most critical information comes from Ross' cell phone footage.
Good makes eye contact, smiles and speaks nicely to her killer as he walks past her drivers side window taking footage. She is in fact trying to deescalate the situation although he has said nothing and she has not yet been called upon to get out of the vehicle. While the situation alone may have been enough I hypothesise that there is something about him that has scared her (and she is deliberately playing cool). He walks around back and passenger side and Good's wife gives him a verbal serve. Something like "You wanta come at us [now why this choice of words, I suspect she is also being triggered by something we cannot see, note phone/camera is held in his right hand] ... why don't you go get yourself some breakfast instead big boy".
Here IMO is the critical observation. At exactly this pont Ross changes the phone into his left hand as he continues to walk around the front passenger side and the front of the car to where he will fire his first shot. That is at the is point when he has been riled by jibes from Good's wife, and before he then steps in front of the car, and with absolutely no situational cues at that point, he begins the process of clearing the path of his right hand to draw his pistol and steps in front of the reversing vehicle.
Now see this police report on the use of this technique as a widespread practice to set up and justify use of lethal force by DHS agents in 2012. Note that Ross joined DHS in 2013.
Initially-Secret Report: Customs & Border Patrol Agents Got in Way of Vehicles, Then Used Deadly Force
At this point I conclude that this was a premediated homicide deliberately carried out in such a fashion as to be presented as a defensive act in a split second by an officer in fear of his life. Very neat indeed."
I would add a few points:
It's been claimed that the wheels of Good's vehicle were "spinning" on ice after she started the vehicle.
There is good reason to belueve that people often misinterpret engine revs or slight wheel slip as “spinning”, especially on ice.
If the wheels were spinning, would it materially change the analysis?
Mechanically / physically
• A vehicle transitioning from reverse to forward on ice will, by definition, have very low initial forward velocity, regardless of wheel spin.
• Wheel spin on ice reduces actual force transfer to the ground.
• A spinning wheel indicates loss of traction, not effective acceleration toward a target.
• A vehicle with spinning wheels is less capable of controlled directional threat, not more.
This is key:
Wheel spin does NOT equal increased danger to a person who has chosen to step into the vehicle’s projected path.
Legally / use-of-force doctrine
In most use-of-force frameworks (including US federal LE):
• The threat is evaluated based on objective imminence and necessity.
• An officer creating the danger (stepping in front of a slow-moving or traction-limited vehicle) undermines a self-defense claim.
• Courts routinely distinguish between:
• a driver accelerating toward an officer who is already trapped, and
• an officer moving into the vehicle’s path.
• Spinning tyres do not strengthen a self-defense argument if the officer had space, time, and alternatives.
• In some cases, they weaken it, because they suggest low traction and low effective threat.
Bottom line
Even if tyres were spinning, that fact alone would not materially justify lethal force if the officer voluntarily placed himself in front of the vehicle during a low-speed transition.
This is a classic post-hoc justification tactic:
• It reframes loss of traction as aggression.
• It shifts attention from officer movement choices to vehicle mechanics.
• It relies on public misunderstanding of vehicle dynamics.
From an analytical standpoint:
• It does not rebut the central claim that the officer placed himself in danger.
• It addresses perception, not necessity.
Could spinning wheels mean Ross was “saved” by reduced acceleration?
Yes, in a purely physical sense, reduced traction reduces acceleration.
Does that support a claim the driver attempted to strike him at high speed?
No — not without additional, independent evidence of intent, such as:
• deliberate steering toward him,
• sustained acceleration once traction improved,
• lack of alternative escape path,
• officer already being trapped.
Wheel spin alone cannot bear that inferential weight.
Bottom-line calibration (very important)
• The defense argument that Good attempted to strike Ross with the vehicle and failed only because loss of traction limited acceleration is permissible but thin.
• The prosecution rebuttal is structurally stronger than the defense argument, because:
• it aligns physics with use-of-force doctrine,
• it centers officer agency rather than vehicle mechanics,
• it avoids speculative counterfactuals.
If this were before a jury, the “spinning wheels saved him” claim would not be decisive — and could easily backfire.
How a prosecutor / civil plaintiff would dismantle that argument
Core rebuttal
Wheel spin weakens, not strengthens, the claim of imminent lethal threat — especially where the officer created the danger.
Step-by-step rebuttal
1. Wheel spin proves loss of control, not homicidal intent
• On ice, throttle input is often necessary merely to regain steering authority.
• Spinning wheels are consistent with:
• attempting to reposition,
• attempting to escape,
• attempting not to stall.
• There is no reliable inference of intent to strike from wheel spin alone.
2. Low traction = low effective threat
• Wheel spin means reduced force transfer.
• The vehicle’s actual forward velocity — not engine noise or RPM — is what matters.
• A traction-limited vehicle is less capable of controlled targeting.
3. Officer-created jeopardy doctrine
• If the officer voluntarily stepped into the vehicle’s path:
• He manufactured the appearance of danger.
• Self-defense law does not reward self-created emergencies.
• Wheel spin does not cure that defect.
4. Counterfactuals are legally weak
• “If the road weren’t icy” is speculative.
• Courts assess what was, not what might have been.
• The actual conditions at the moment matter.
The decisive issue neither side can escape
This is the hinge point, legally and analytically:
Who controlled the geometry of the encounter at the critical moment?
If:
• the officer had lateral space,
• the vehicle was slow or traction-limited,
• and the officer stepped into the projected path,
then wheel spin does not rescue a self-defense claim.
He needs to be arrested or indicted prior to being tried, and only in a federal jurisdiction. Neither will happen. This will not be a George Floyd moment. But even though they will be trying their best to wrest it away, the democrats will not win on this.
A huge deal is approaching this month. The Dems next move is to stop the exportation of their invasion by shutting down the government again. Like the demonstrators, the Deep State, waiting in DC, is full of Dem thugs waiting to do damage to Trump and the rest of the anti-government folks.
One thing is a constant, if the press would not swarm to these “protests” day after day, and do a Lois Lane by encouraging the thugs, they would not happen.
Sidebar
A Lois Lane is an act designated by Lois in Superman 1, “ If there is no news to report, it is our job to create the news”.
That lengthy analysis is a classic example of forensic crash reports. Wrong outcomes often occur when incorrect decisions continue to be made incrementally which build up and eventually result in a catastrophe, often in a matter of seconds.
Automobile, airplane even crossing the street, happens all the time.
A year ago, a guy took his pick up truck and plowed into reverlers in New Orleans. I am dumbstruck by how dumb anyone is to believe vehicles aren't potential weapons and an officer will treat it as such.
Unfortunately, Ross will probably have to tell it to the judge, insofar as the prosecution should very easily be able to demonstrate that there is a facie case and argue that a properly instructed jury could convict. What's not clear yet is what court he will be tried in and when.
Check out the youtube video. You may or may not be correct but if you're a sadist, enforcing sadism or spineless sadism subtype, and killing or harming wrongdoers gives you a boner, and you need a pretext for a thrill kill, it's a neat way to do it.
Initially-Secret Report From 2013: Customs & Border Patrol Agents Got in Way of Vehicles, Then Used Deadly Force
Hostility sublimated in the "public interest," cops, "bossy" supervisors, deans, judges; possesses the "right" to be pitiless, merciless, coarse, and barbarous; task is to control and punish, to search out rule breakers.
Spineless sadism
Including avoidant features: Insecure, bogus, and cowardly; venomous dominance and cruelty is counterphobic; weakness counteracted by group support; public swaggering; selects powerless scapegoats.
Tyrannical sadism
Including negativistic features:
Relishes menacing and brutalizing others, forcing them to cower and submit; verbally cutting and scathing, accusatory and destructive; intentionally surly, abusive, inhumane, unmerciful.
Explosive sadism
Including borderline features:
Unpredictably precipitous outbursts and fury; uncontrollable rage and fearsome attacks; feelings of humiliation are pent-up and discharged; subsequently contrite.
Beat me to it, dk. I read this yesterday and it looked compelling to me, if the writer's points of law are correct. Like Dennis says, essential reading! Sick of all the uninformed blahblahblah.
Good was violating 18 U.S.C. § 111, which prohibits “assaulting, resisting or impeding federal officers." Can involve up to 1 year in prison.
There’s also 18 U.S.C. § 371 — “Conspiracy to commit offense against the United States,” which carries five years in prison."
The funders and organizers of these harassment campaigns (handing out manuals with tactics to use, organizing online, encouraging protestors to use their cars to block federal officers, etc.) could fall into that category.
Don't kid yourself for a minute. The funders of this want a confrontation to happen where one of their useful idiots is harmed. Then they can escalate their narrative and make the story about the federal response. They don't care about criminal illegal aliens being deported and they don't care about protestors being harmed. This is a method to expand their ideology using well meaning but misguided and naive people to be their "resistors."
Federal Agents have pretty much left the protestors alone. That may change now.
So they are stopping an invasion that is pointed at destruction of all things AmeriCAN. The “troops” need to be sent home. The workers need to be sent home to improve their own countries.
As most are not supposed to be voters, the vote will become less corrupt with the removal of the invaders.
Not at all, Ashley Babbit had no weapon and was not in the middle of assaulting anyone, she was straight up murdered by a black Fed who got away with it, and that was Racial 100%!
All that to say, it doesn't matter; she violated so many rules of driving and the law.
Pedestrians have the right of way, period, end of story.
Had she shut the engine off and complied, she would have been arrested for obstruction.
Better yet, had they not shown up to protest and obstruct with their deadly weapon, aka a car, she would still be alive.
The point is, if you are going to protest, then do so from a sidewalk, not from a car and never drive in a manner where a pedestrian, armed or otherwise, is in the path.
The stench of this "event" is overpowering the George Floyd fiasco. It doesn't take a very deep dive into some details along with noticing the out-of-proportion response in the media to confirm something is rotten in Denmark. Or is that Greenland? Start with the obvious question of why does "her" vehicle come tagged with out-of-state plates?
Operation Chaos continues, at the expense of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness by the non-government-agent portion of the population. When I attended college in Minneapolis in the early 1980s, I did not imagine the initial gay parades (or was it the music from Prince?) would lead us to this. It's a purple haze/rain all right.
The parades broke the laws of life. It was a fall and like all falls it accelerates. The wise Russians break up such things. The police arrive and help the citizens in so doing.
Well, when Intel is running the parade/protest, the police (another branch of Intel) won't show up to help the honest everyday citizens, who are the real targets and victims.
It would not have been to the Puppet Master's advantage to have a new administration completely sweep away the existing psyops dealing with immigration and wokeness. But Trump was allowed to enjoy a brief "There's a new sheriff in town" stage, falsely giving the MAGA drones some hope, which is now being crushed as it becomes obvious it's business as usual.
The U.S. Republic represents many obstacles for the Globalists, and they're continuing to break it down and collapse it. A Civil War like the last one advanced their goals - it would not be surprising to see another.
In the army we had a saying: "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes". Lesbian are nearly always obnoxious, arrogant, and mentally ill. It's a better world without her/him/it.
Learned from watching protesters in Chicago blocking the Dan Ryan Expressway or the many during other protests where they congregated in the streets to stop traffic. Using the vehicle seems like a unique and more dangerous tactic as it is a potential weapon.
After seeing what happened to Reginald Denny, I would drive through protesters rather than risk them pulling me or my loved ones out of the car.
Threat assessment skill is needed, and each instance requires one to have their eyes open.
In the Reginal Denny case, I would have blasted the horn and punched it into first gear based simply on the crowd and the theatrics involved with that crowd.
It is playing chicken, to see who blinks first. It is the cops job to not blink and uphold the law. Our lovely Leftist society just uses the incidents that WILL happen. Sickos.
I know you're stupid, but even you can't be this stupid.
Case in point, Phil Denter walks out into traffic and makes an ass of himself.
Yes, he probably makes an ass of himself in the real world, not just here, but only if he knows he won't get beaten up.
Do you drive around him or over him?
Is it Phil harmlessly standing on a soapbox telling everyone crazy shit about Trump? Drive around, of course, with a nasty honk, and a yelled "get out of the road, dumbass!"
Or does he have a brick and thirty other people pulling white people out of cars and beating the shit out of them?
Is there a safe path around him and his mostly peaceful friends?
Your choices again run him over or get pulled out of your car and beaten to a pulp or even murdered. If there is no path out, hit the horn and tell him, I will run your ass over, get the fuck out of the way.
Rioters are not pedestrians!
The law regarding driving through riots is complex and varies significantly by state, but the general consensus is that drivers do not have the right to deliberately drive into a crowd unless they reasonably believe their life is in imminent danger. Several states have enacted specific laws that provide civil or criminal immunity to drivers in certain circumstances.
General Legal Principles
Self-Defense: In all states, the use of deadly force (which can include driving a vehicle into a person) is legally justified only when a driver reasonably believes it is necessary to protect themselves or others against death or serious bodily injury.
Duty to Retreat: Some state laws have "stand your ground" principles, but a driver generally does not have a duty to retreat if doing so would put them in more danger.
Obstructing Traffic is Illegal: Protesters do not have a First Amendment right to block public roadways and impede traffic. Unlawful obstruction of a public street is typically an arrestable offense, and in some states, a felony.
(Officer-Created Danger and Unjustified Lethal Force)
Introduction
Members of the jury, this case is not about hindsight. It is about choices — choices made by a trained federal agent in the seconds before he fired the fatal shots. The evidence will show that the defendant created the very danger he then claimed justified lethal force, and that his use of deadly force was neither necessary nor reasonable under the circumstances.
1. The Encounter Begins Without an Imminent Threat
You will see video from multiple angles, including the defendant’s own phone recording.
That footage shows:
• The decedent seated in her vehicle.
• Calm verbal interaction.
• Eye contact, smiling, and an apparent attempt to de-escalate.
• No commands given to exit the vehicle.
• No weapon displayed.
• No sudden or aggressive movement by the driver.
At this stage, there is no imminent threat — and no lawful basis for deadly force.
2. The Defendant Anticipates Lethal Force Before Any Threat Emerges
As the defendant walks around the vehicle, something important happens.
He transfers his phone from his right hand to his left.
This is not accidental.
This is not reflexive.
It clears his dominant hand — the hand he uses to draw his firearm.
This occurs before the vehicle moves forward in any meaningful way and before any credible threat to his life exists.
The prosecution will submit that this action demonstrates anticipation, not reaction.
3. The Defendant Voluntarily Places Himself in the Vehicle’s Path
Next, the defendant moves to the front of the vehicle.
The evidence will show:
• He had lateral space.
• He was not pinned.
• He was not boxed in.
• He was not struck or dragged.
Instead, he steps into the projected path of a vehicle that is transitioning from reverse to forward on an icy surface — a maneuver that necessarily involves low initial speed and limited traction.
This is a critical point.
Law enforcement training universally teaches officers not to place themselves in front of vehicles precisely because doing so manufactures danger.
4. The Vehicle’s Movement Does Not Justify Deadly Force
The defense may argue that the vehicle posed a deadly threat.
But the evidence will show:
• The vehicle was moving slowly.
• Any wheel spin indicates loss of traction, not effective acceleration.
• Loss of traction reduces control and speed.
• The defendant was able to step laterally as the vehicle passed.
A slow-moving, traction-limited vehicle does not present the same imminent lethal threat as a vehicle accelerating rapidly toward a trapped officer.
And importantly, any danger that did exist was created by the defendant’s own positioning.
5. The Shooting Itself Shows Control, Not Panic
You will hear about the firing sequence:
• An initial shot fired downward through the windshield.
• Follow-up shots fired through the driver’s side window as the vehicle moves past.
This is not indiscriminate firing.
This is targeted, sequential engagement.
Such controlled firing is inconsistent with a claim of blind panic or unavoidable split-second fear.
6. Post-Shooting Conduct Undermines a Self-Defense Claim
After the shooting, the defendant:
• Uses hostile language toward the wounded driver.
• Walks after the vehicle.
• Does not immediately render aid.
While post-event conduct does not alone determine guilt, it is relevant to assessing whether the defendant was acting out of genuine fear for his life.
7. The Law Does Not Excuse Officer-Created Danger
The law is clear.
An officer may not:
• Create a dangerous situation,
• Step into harm’s way,
• And then claim self-defense when that danger materializes.
Deadly force is justified only when it is necessary to prevent imminent death or serious bodily harm — not when an officer manufactures the appearance of such a threat.
Conclusion
The prosecution is not required to prove that the defendant planned this encounter hours or days in advance.
What the evidence does show is that:
• He anticipated the use of lethal force,
• He placed himself in the vehicle’s path,
• He fired at a moment when retreat and avoidance were available,
• And he did so under circumstances that do not meet the legal standard for self-defense.
We will ask you to find that the defendant’s actions were unreasonable, unjustified, and criminal.
The legal standard is the objective reasonableness of the action from the perspective of the officer, not your thesis-volume justification of something that occurred within a couple of seconds while you get to analyze for hours while sitting on your comfortable couch reviewing videos.
Minnesota Statute 609.066, signed into law by Gov. Tim Walz in 2020:
Subd. 2.Use of deadly force.
(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 609.06 or 609.065, the use of deadly force by a peace officer in the line of duty is justified only if an objectively reasonable officer would believe, based on the totality of the circumstances known to the officer at the time and without the benefit of hindsight, that such force is necessary:
(1) to protect the peace officer or another from death or great bodily harm, provided that the threat:
(i) can be articulated with specificity;
(ii) is reasonably likely to occur absent action by the law enforcement officer; and
(iii) must be addressed through the use of deadly force without unreasonable delay; or
(2) to effect the arrest or capture, or prevent the escape, of a person whom the peace officer knows or has reasonable grounds to believe has committed or attempted to commit a felony and the officer reasonably believes that the person will cause death or great bodily harm to another person under the threat criteria in clause (1), items (i) to (iii), unless immediately apprehended.
I live in the land of ice and I can squarely call bullshit on #2 and that calls into question all your argument. She was an angry, irrational woman impeding a law enforcement operation. Put yourself in that Honda listening to your boyfriend talking smack to an armed Fed. Would you be that stupid? Would you believe you could drive, wheels spinning on ice within 180 compass degrees of his direction? Put down the mai-tai and sober up.
Yes, and after all the years of abuse we've silently taken from these left wing bastards; I want to see them all choke on their own blood. Does that make me a bad person?
You are a leftist. The US supported the communists in WW2 and fought against the political right. The Nazis were not, as idiots like you believe, "socialist" or "left wing."
The claim that the German Nazis were “socialist” or “left-wing” because the word socialist appears in Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP) is a name-based fallacy that collapses under historical, ideological, and empirical scrutiny.
Below is a clear, evidence-based rebuttal.
1. Names are propaganda, not ideology
Political movements often mislabel themselves for strategic appeal.
The Nazis deliberately used “socialist” and “workers” to attract working-class voters away from Marxist parties, which were genuinely left-wing and far more popular among German workers in the early 1930s.
Once in power, the Nazis destroyed actual socialist and communist organizations.
Historical parallels:
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is neither democratic nor a republic.
The Patriot Act undermines civil liberties.
“People’s” or “Workers’” in a party name has often been used by explicitly anti-left regimes.
A word in a title is not dispositive; policy, doctrine, and practice are.
2. The Nazis violently eradicated the Left
If the Nazis were left-wing, their first actions make no sense.
Immediately after taking power (1933):
The Communist Party (KPD) was banned
The Social Democratic Party (SPD) was banned
Trade unions were dissolved and replaced with a state-controlled labor front
Thousands of leftists were imprisoned or murdered (Dachau’s first inmates were communists and social democrats)
This was not an intra-left dispute; it was extermination.
3. Nazi “socialism” rejected core socialist principles
Socialism—across its major traditions—centers on:
Class analysis
Internationalism
Worker control or ownership of the means of production
Opposition to inherited hierarchy
Nazism rejected all of these.
Nazi ideology instead emphasized:
Racial hierarchy, not class struggle
Ultranationalism, not international solidarity
Private property, provided owners served the state
Authoritarianism, not worker empowerment
Hitler explicitly rejected Marxism as “Jewish” and viewed class politics as corrosive to national unity.
4. The Nazi economy was not socialist
The Nazis did not abolish capitalism.
Major industries (Krupp, IG Farben, Siemens, Thyssen) remained privately owned
Industrialists profited enormously under Nazi rule
The regime privatized several state-owned enterprises (railways, steel, banks)—a fact noted by historians such as Götz Aly and Adam Tooze
What existed was state-directed capitalism, not socialism:
Private ownership + state goals + repression of labor
This is closer to corporatism or fascism, not the left
5. The “left wing of the Nazi Party” was purged
Early on, some figures (e.g., Gregor Strasser) promoted a pseudo-anti-capitalist rhetoric.
What happened to them?
They were murdered or sidelined, especially during the Night of the Long Knives (1934)
Hitler explicitly chose industrial elites and the military over any anti-capitalist faction
This decisively settled the question of what kind of regime Nazism was.
6. Every serious historian classifies Nazism as far-right
This is not controversial in academic history.
Nazism is universally classified as:
Far-right
Fascist
Ultranationalist
Racialist
Anti-liberal and anti-Marxist
This consensus spans:
Liberal historians
Conservative historians
Marxist historians
The “Nazis were left-wing” claim appears almost exclusively in modern polemics, not scholarship.
Bottom line
Nazism was not socialist in any meaningful sense.
It was a far-right, fascist, racial-nationalist ideology that:
Destroyed the Left
Preserved private capital
Rejected class politics
Replaced socialism with racial myth and authoritarian rule
The presence of the word “socialist” in the party’s name tells us about Nazi propaganda, not Nazi ideology.
I would suggest you take a reading comprehension course, except that you can't put a pint of milk in a half-point bottle. You fuckheads commenting here, communists almost every single last one of you, think that national socialism is left. Wrong!
The author is a former Senior Lecturer in International Relations, with one of his two PhDs being in German studies. He does proper academic research. I recommend the book.
We've been done this road before. They put money on all the numbers on the Roulette wheel so they never completely lose; a foot in every door. But they do prefer some outcomes. Do you really think they wanted the agrarian South to hold off the industrial North? Of course not, BUT they gave money to the South too. Now apply this to WW2. Are you up to it? I mean can you even see the analogy I just made?
If they really wanted the South to win, they would have given far more money and brought in British troops too.
Do you really think Wall Street wanted the Nazis to win? How does that tie in with Globalism and blending Whites out of existence? Make an argument, a real one. I'm listening.
A biased account of the scene. Immediately inaccurate when it states the “killer” was at the driver’s window, but somehow was also on the other side of the car with the wife.
It forgets one thing, she put herself at risk by being there in the first place. Purposely aggravating the situation in a highly charged scene was almost suicidal. The officer had been involved in a drive away three weeks before, he was a loose cannon. Look closely, he is filming the scene, especially the driver, up to the point that she shifts into drive, then pulls the gun, intending to use it. There is no doubt about that.
A rule for these “protestors”, “ When you mess with the bull, you get the horn”. When approached by a cop, of any sort, do what you are told. They do not have those sidearms for no reason. Society selects cops to protect itself from the thugs.
These women were playing chicken with the cops and sometimes violence will occur. They had fun, until it wasn’t.
She wasn't trying to de escalate the situation. That was a manipulative tactic as described in their protest/resist manuals. Taunt and push things to the edge of being illegal then when confronted act sweet and non confrontational as if you're innocent. It's bullshit. Those two were tracking and harassing ICE all day. They just didn't believe there would be any consequences.
Triers-of-face . . . AGAIN, the legal standard is the reasonable objectiveness of the action FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE OFFICER. This has stood the test of time up to the Supreme Court for decades. Play "trier-of-fact" all you like.
I only cite it as an example of how the incident is being appraised even in backwaters around the world. The interesting thing is that none of those natives in those south Pacific islands or in most places want to come to America. The way they seeit is thst the US is full of illegals raping and murdering and based on their experiences with American tourists they think native born Americans, whether cops or civilians are not really any less likely to be sadistic psychopaths.
C’mon, do not be naive. Millions of traffic stops, or other cop encounters and here is one that went bad, one. After what I see in the world, the USA is still one of the safest places to be. You sound like Lois Lane and the press, make things a hundred times worse than it is. Put yourself in the cops position, he is filming the event, when the car switches to forward movement. What would you do? In a split second.
"After what I see in the world, the USA is still one of the safest places to be."
Not really, John. At 5.763 the USA is 65th in homicides per 100,000. Using that safety measure, there are 139 countries safer than the USA (including Cuba and Afghanistan!).
Well the US is rank 30 in cross national IQ comparisons and you're probably well below the mean, as a result of syphilis from all the other guys you've fellated or from the effects of the spike protein on your frontal lobes, after being vaxxed, either through injection or through shedding, with the Trump mRNA death shots. So of course you and other traitors to your race who celebrate when white women are shot by people married to non-white immigrants wouldn't give a rats ass because that would be too great a cognitive load. Go off now and hero worship your Obama or your Karl Marx that Lincoln wrote love letters to.
Fu@king arm chair quarterback. Spin it until you win it. There was no requirement for the officer to move at all. It was his legal duty to stop the vehicle. It is part of the job description.
If someone starts chasing the officer with deadly force, is it his responsibility to run? To de-escalate? Not when I was on the street. Not now in any but the most woke jurisdictions.
In the bad old days in Oakland, if your actions were within Departmental regulations and policy, you would be backed to the hilt, public opinion and politics be damned.
If you were without that policy, you would be thrown to the wolves...prosecuted even. I was a principal in one of the largest internal affairs investigation in the history of the department (up to that point), and the Department backed me up. I had a buddy from recruit school, however, who had his apartment raided by vice, where they found a few marijuana seeds in his vacuum cleaner...terminated with a felony conviction.
Who can forget the Somali cop who shot past his partner's nose to kill an Australian yoga teacher in her night gown who had called them in the first place. White, in a white gown - she must have seemed like a ghost to this worthy. He made a brief statement and that was it for 8 months. No nothing from the state. That's Somali power in the Twin Cities. They came for him eventually, but I have no idea if the trial ever happened or what as the outcome.
Nah, been staying close to home for winter, JAZ. Been working around the property mostly, clearing brush and removing a few trees. Sometime I'm holed up here for days on end. I'm pretty sure when I drive down to the coast on the first mild day of the season -- sometime in mid march, a 40 mile trip -- the shoreline will look pretty much how I left in October. One weather variation that I do notice is more high wind days than in the past. Not sure what it means, if anything.
Phoenix is warm, 70s as highs and 40-50 as the lows. Flagstaff though looks like Colorado with the ski area doing well. Our winter has been wet, ha, we had two storms come through from the Pacific, unusual. We never have a lot of wind, as we usually do not have the storms. Lots of Sun.
They all think that large muscular Blacks can be arrested without force. As one cop said in an article, You try it.
Saw a great clip of three police women trying to arrest a large Black man. When sweet talking wouldn't work, he just shook them off almost effortlessly.
Women who grow up without brothers often have no idea how much stronger men are compared to women.
In Oakland, when I was working, there was only one female sworn police officer. She was large and formidable, and she worked in the Juvenile section...no patrol...ever.
Thanks for the long and thoughtful comment. There is a lot to process as time goes on and more information comes out.
Maybe it's because in my youth I was a crazy hippie chick and had my own nasty run-ins with the cops, I have never been a fan of police fetishization wherein they can do no wrong.
I am MAGA all the way and will support President Trump forever, but I am getting a little tired of the "law and order" crap where no one on our side is allowed to question anything done by the police.
My first reaction to this shooting was that she totally deserved it and got what was coming to her. Maybe because I am rightfully prejudiced against women such that I cannot stand bitches like Renee Good, that I was willing to jump on that bandwagon. I thought this was FAFO all the way.
But there are two sides to every story, sometimes three.
Thanks Kathy. I can't believe what mixed feelings I have about this. I would never say this was "murder" by any means. And she was really "asking for it" in so many ways. But somehow it doesn't seem right that she paid for her stupidity and derangement with her life.
Years ago I was part of a group that was trying to abolish the corrupt police department in our NY town. This was way before BLM and defund the police.
We didn't need the local police force because we had other coverage by the sheriff and state troopers.
To say that our PD behaved badly would be an understatement. They were violent and out of control. They intimidated the town board and the citizens. In short they behaved like criminals and thugs.
Eventually we were able to abolish the PD but not till after a civil war.
Again and again, the individual must enforce civility in a society through morality. Government does not give a damn in its drive for power, always dividing, always encouraging immorality .
The Deep State is integral to all the immoral attributes in the country, concentrated mostly in the cities.
You are so right. Government only cares about one things besides power- MONEY. I see it constantly where I live in small town NY.
They collect many, many millions from us in property and other taxes, yet a struggling small business owner with a deli can't borrow $50 grand so he can stay in business till the summer.
I am so sick and tired of the goddamn politicians who get elected with their BS promises to help the tax slaves. I can't find even ONE OF THEM who will help me find government money for the business owner.
They are disgusting. By the way- the Republicans are 1000 times worse than the Dems. in this regard.
Thanks for being open minded. I'm no fan of lesbians but I'm also not a fan of the murdering of white women, even if they are lesbians. Interesting that the killer's wife is non-white and an immigrant. I like Trump but not as much as I previously did. I like MTG. She's against the Trump mRNA death shots. She would have picked Epstein for a pervert within a nanosecond like Secretary Lutnick, Epstein's former neighbor did, not have been his best buddy for years and never notice a thing. And she's MAGA not MIGA.
You need to be put in the same exact situation as that ICE officer, then see what YOU do. If you were intelligent, you would do what he did. If you are a brainwashed leftist moron, you would get run over.
You made a typical leftist diatribe--perverting the facts to fit your sick narrative. In most conservative states the level of threat that justifies the use of lethal force is:
If a victim reasonably feels that he or she is in danger of imminent danger of serious personal injury or death from an assailant, the victim may use deadly force to defend himself or herself. Good was in no danger of sustaining serious injury or death from the ICE officer(s) UNTIL she attempted to commit vehicular assault against the ICE agent. The ICE officer absolutely WAS at risk of imminent serious personal injury or death from Good when she drove toward him (and did hit him). He was fully justified in killing her. Leftists are trying to make Good into a martyr for "dying for the cause." Good was a moron who physically assaulted a law enforcement officer doing his sworn duty to enforce the law, and Good got herself killed as result.
Mr. Freedom, you said it much better than I could have---Thank you.
Awake not woke had his head up his rear and is definitely not looking at the facts or accepting of the fact that when a LEO tells you to sit down and shut up or.....get out of your car, that is what you do. Her death is exactly what her instructors wanted to happen so they would then be able to try to get sympathy for their unjust cause. Her instructors are the ones that should be indicted, not the guy who is trying to protect us from the criminal invaders.
I'm very, very pro-white. You're on the left. You are a communist. You identify with the killer because his wife is non-white and because the dead woman's white.
I think many of us here are more concerned about culture, order and spirituality than skin color.
If an officer pulls you over, it’s SOP to turn of the ignition and keep your hands in sight, NOT to start maneuvering wildly to the point you impact one of them or another pedestrian.
Given the current ideological climate, I would half expect a vehicle stopped in that location to be a possible car bomb.
No, he's as wrong as you are. The dead woman was white and, notwithstanding that she was a lesbian, was reportedly a Christian. If she had been from the middle east and of a different religion then she would be a hero to you.
Can't help but wonder, if you were the one standing in front of the vehicle about to be run down, if you would have all these opinions ,the man was hit a few months ago and drug and required stitches. that's all I need to know, this woman disobeyed lawful commands ,therefore she got herself killed, nothing to see here, I refuse to Pretend This is a tragedy, it is not, this is a stupid idiot, that played a dumbass game and won the grand prize. I do not believe the world is any poorer because she is no longer in it .I have no sympathy for brain dead morons that place themselves in positions in which they can get killed for no good reason, the woman was an idiot, now there's one less idiot on the planet, not celebrating just stating the facts. She decided to go there therefore she is fully responsible for everything that occurred to her. Nothing else to see here
Just the previous day in that same city......this very thing with Renee Good happened....to another person involved with ICE agents. Months earlier the ICE agent involved took 33 stitches in a similiar incident with a vehicle. This was on the minds of these ICE agents. Renee Good should have gotten outta the vehicle and really should have "observed" from the sidewalk like everyone else. Classic case of FAFO.
The previous day in Minneapolis, a Cuban illegal immigrant used his vehicle as a weapon. It ended with his vehicle crashing and everyone luckily was not killed....though some minor injuries. The Cuban was arrested and will be deported. This is what was in the minds of the ICE agents commanding Renee Good to get the fuck outta the vehicle.
All your second guessing from a few thousand miles away means nothing.
The officer did not step in front of Good, when she reversed the car the front of the car turned directly at him. You can see it through the windshield. Her partner was starting to open the passenger door, it is not clear what happened to her. After stopping in reverse with the car aimed at the officer, she put it into drive and started to come forward. If I was the officer standing off to the side and the car suddenly reversed and faced me I too would wonder wtf.
She was also ordered to get out of the car. She disobeyed that order. She’s already in trouble at that point, resisting arrest. Your friend is just plain wrong.
" Half the women in this country look like they could be harpooneers on the whaler Pequod." This is the most honest take of women who get tattoos. Its disgusting. I hope I live long enough to see these women at 70. They will appear as bruised bananas; their overpriced detailed body artwork diminished to blurry, unrecognizable stains.
I tried telling that to my daughter, as she continued to cover her body in tattoos.
It makes me sick seeing the beautiful child that came out of my body, now covered in tattoos!
So often, I see females at gatherings who have on beautiful dresses, their hair and make-up done just right, and ugly, gross tattoos covering their arms. The tattoos make all the rest of the beauty disappear!
I read once that women tattoo themselves and pierce their faces because they hate themselves and this act is some kind of subconscious act of self punishment.
I was in the grocery store this weekend and I needed help finding a certain product. I approached an employee of the store, a young woman, probably in her early twenties. a white girl. When she turned to face me after I called out to her what I saw was a fairly attractive young woman with dark hair and pale skin. Then I looked at her face. In her nose and lips were at least 6 studs and piercings. I looked at her face. She made eye contact with me, caught me gawking at her self mutilation, and she looked down. She never made eye contact with me again during our interaction. Her voice was muted as if she was afraid to talk. This girl was a total loser. I could tell the moment she avoided making eye contact with me. It broke my heart. I wanted to tell her in the kindest way possible that she was a beautiful girl and to take those awful metal railroad spikes out of her nose and her face and embrace her feminine beauty. I didn't. Once she had found my desired product she skulked away and disappear around the corner of the aisle to hide until her next dreaded customer interaction.
Self hatred. It's the only reason that makes any sense as to why women, young women especially, do this to themselves.
Tattoos remind me of graffiti on the side of unused railroad cars. And, to be honest, I find I am seeing more and more tattoos on women than on men.
You should go back to the store and find her & some excuse to talk to her and say what you wanted to say. It sounds like she regrets what she did to herself (likely at a time of emotional distress).
You don’t know that. You may be the supportive grandfather figure she never had or the alternative to the actual sexual or physical abuser that she actually had to endure. If you decide to do it, be sure to bring your wife along or someone who looks like she could be your wife.
Perhaps, but I in reality I am quite a timid soul who tries really hard to leave people alone. In return I just want them to leave me alone. This girl went to work to do a job, she probably wouldn't like having some stranger tell her how to live her life. So, I demure from telling her what a loving parent should have told her many times before.
And she's probably quite satisfied in the life she has chosen and worked to achieve. Good for her. Wish I could say the same thing about my oldest daughter.
That girl perhaps had a parent whom she thought did not approve of her. She was getting back. Love and hugs with warm affectionate reassurances from parents can help prevent this in our children.
"Self hatred. It's the only reason that makes any sense as to why women, young women especially, do this to themselves." Possibly self loathing, but definitely a harbinger of Low IQ and/or a high dose of sociopathy.
Tattoos = No empathy for ones own future
If one does not have empathy for ones own future then what chance any empathy for others now or in the future.
Just today I was at the gym and a relatively attractive young woman came in to use the weights nearby where I was working out. I kid you not, the woman had a tattoo on her face, surrounding her left eye that resembled the facial tattoo on Mike Tyson.
Oh and I might add that I would not be surprised if it was found that there is a disproportionate number of people with tatts that attended child care compared to those whom did not.
Child Care facilities are sociopath factories.
Yes, I am positing a direct relationship in the ruinous breakdowns of western societies with the advent of child care.
It shows that they are "cool" Cool means respectable now. It used to mean being a rebel, but the rebels won.
Keith Richard exploded when Mick accepted Knighthood from the Queen. Mick explained to him: It means that we've won. Keith was clinging to a now imaginary outlaw stance.
It’s human graffiti. I was at a spa the other day and there was a young woman there with a perfect swimsuit model figure covered head to foot in tattoos. Why? I had the same reaction when going to Rome or Paris and seeing ugly idiotic graffiti on a centuries old architecturally beautiful building.
IDK its a mind virus. The other issue no one talks about, is the slow, progressive immune dysregulation caused by having a foreign substance in the largest organ of the human body (skin). Of course our $ick care $ystem loves tattoos and will never mention the long term health consequences. Until you consider everything offered and condoned by the main stream as threats to your life/health, you open the door to become a victim/paying sick care customer.
Yes, I couldn't agree more with the comments here. Over the decades, I've been bullied by tattoo artists that I know to succumb to their 'body art'. No way! I would never in my wildest dreams think of defacing the beautiful skin that God gave me. I've earned every gray hair and wrinkle on my body and they are my crown of glory! I was knit perfectly in my mother's womb.
They are crying out for parental love and guidance, with more hugs and assurances from a loving parent. That is always needed to prevent a feeling of low self esteem.
The tattoo generation has become the embodiment of the Carny at any county or state fair. The guys all want to pretend masculinity by resembling Japaneses and Chinese gangsters. It's all so pathetic.
I have been a life long weight trainer and amateur body builder. I spend a lot of time at the local gym trying desperately to maintain that muscle mass (as I age it is getting harder and harder to do) and I always enjoy being among the younger people there and partaking of the positive energy that is so prevalent in these places. I see some amazing physical forms there in. Male and female. What always chagrins me is when I see a young body builder of female or male persuasions and that beautiful body they are working so hard to build and chisel is covered with tattoos. I can't see the delineation of the muscles because the muscles are covered by ugly graffiti-like tattoos. One day, I am going to approach one of these individuals, tap them on the shoulder and explain to them that they are obscuring the very thing they are trying to improve. One day....
Expensive tattoos…soaking up luxury poverty money from women (and men) who have no families to support so become spendthrifts on body art. And women are walking away in droves from their partners and children. This couple pretty much illustrates one of the major crisis points in our
culture.
And my 30-something daughter is caught up in this swirl of drain-circling but I’m not allowed to say a peep about it lest I be labeled with brain-dead names. I mourn quietly and see no grandchildren in my future.
I told my errant daughter to stop acting like her boyfriend's unpaid whore and demand more from him, to get married. She hasn't spoken to me for 4 years. How dare I attempt to get this stupid girl to demand more from her man and to have a little self respect.
Girls go to college happy and wanting to build futures, and come back obese and sterilized, dressing like men while hating them, despising God, loathing everyone and everything, covered in piercings and tattoos -- and in many cases their mothers think this is fine. Why, "there's nothing wrong with Buffy! She's just finding her way! How dare you say anything?! You're not supportive. You don't love our daughter, and you obviously don't love me either, you male chauvinist bastard!"
My oldest daughter, 25, raised in a christian and religious home, was taught to avoid tattoos, alcohol and to get married before having children. The moment she left home she started sleeping around with various men and boozing it up.
She now has two children, no education and is living with a man who can't be bothered to put a ring on her finger and commit to her. He drives a truck, she works at UPS. They have no money, or so they claim, but they always seem to have money for booze and tattoos. Or, at least, credit cards.
This was a girl who was raised to NOT engage in this kind of a lifestyle.
American women are bat shit crazy. It doesn't surprise me at all that young men have no interest in this and would rather jerk off to AI porn these days. Not that that does them any good either. Porn is as addictive and mind numbing as alcohol.
The ones that get me are the ones always begging me for a $20 "loan" (yeah right!) "because I just need a little gas money please Dennis."
Standing at my door stinking to high-heaven of Tobacco.
In NZ, the gubmint, trying to quell smoking by young people, has put HUGE taxes on tobacco and fags. That little pouch of backy is NZ$85 I think! No shit!
So sorry. When they do the typical rebellious breakaway from parental control, that is the exact time they need warm hugs and reassurances of love and support while teaching them about higher standards.
You took your eyes & wisdom off of her for the few seconds it took for her rebellion! You can’t start parenting in the middle….must be always and forever! Children slip away in the bat-of- an eye! I feel for you!
It can happen very quickly. Many sent their daughter off to college and never saw her again if they took women's studies or just started going to the women's center. It's not just a small Cult, but an international one of vast wealth and power.
'One huge cia op' another installment in the series
[CIA agents are tight-lipped, but Steinem spoke openly about her relationship to The Agency in the 1950s and ’60s after a magazine revealed her employment by a CIA front organization, the Independent Research Service.]
Childless & unmarried, Steinem refused to put anything about family and children in the Equal Rights Amendment which Betty Friedan, a mother of 3 had requested….Steinem is bitter & evil yet young women glorify her.
The piercing I find most odd is the huge gauge stud these girls put through their tongues. I saw one girl who had one so large she couldn't shut her mouth. Of course, she was obese, had purple hair and was covered with tattoos.
I always chuckle at the dudes and girls who take the little discs out. They are left with this stringy floppy thing under their earlobes dangling down to their shoulders.
As a young hippy at University in NZ in...1968...oh dear! I am fuckin old!
I had my long blond hair down to my arse, and one pierced earring.
Cool huh! Flower Power baby!
One day I was combing my magnificent long locks and ripped that loop earring clean out! Ouch ..fuckin hell ~ lots of blood and screaming!
Continuing this story......
I married a gorgeous tall CA girl in Wellington NZ. Oh man!!!!!!! ( My redneck NZ Dad reckoned my dick was a larger part of my brain..and "why don't you get your fuckin nose pierced then!") LOL
My new bride suggested that if we go to Murica, and meet her Dad, best I get a haircut. I cut it off, and we sold the locks to a wig maker.
Anne showed her Dad a photo of his new son-in-law. She told me many years later that he said.."Jeez honey, his hair is pretty long eh!" LOL
We flew to Arkadelphia, Arkansas...Holy cow..talk about culture shock!
"Where you from honey? .."uuh, I'm from New Zealand"
"That's nice. We got a boy at the local University who is from Saudi Arabia too" WTF! LOL
Then my new Father-in-law took me to his Lions Club meeting for lunch. And I got to find out why all the University grid iron team is black guys.......you don't want to know! LOL
Dad wanted to buy us a new car for a wedding present. We went car shopping in Littlerock. The Buick salesman pulled me aside...."Son, you know that this car was made right here in St Louis!" hahaha... we bought a Chevy Vega (US$2,999) instead of the new Ford Pinto with the exploding gas tank. And drove to the HEPUSEF gas station to fill up at 40cents per gallon. And set out on I40 to LA ~ right in the middle of the 73-74 gas crisis and Tricky Dicky deciding to resign! "I am not a crook!" What a country eh!
End of story:
We repaired my pierced ear hole. New diamond stud! LOL
Only to find out in Murica it was in the wrong side! I was a homo! LOL
BTW, the NZ Māori call a queer......wait for it...... a "shirt lifter!" LOL
Has the Meds Cart arrived yet?
EDIT: Salesman: Its $2,999. Me: OK we will take it! Poor old Dad nearly had a heart attack about his new son-in-law. Fuck, this moron my daughter picked does not even know how to barter the price down! (In NZ you had to wait for months and then pay the dealer under the table to get a new car! LOL)
Very well put. And, while we're at it, can we make a conscious effort to reject the emotivism that brought us same-sex "marriage." For example, we might say, "the woman she thought she was married to," instead of acquiescing to the foolishness and referring to her as "her wife."
Female here and I agree. A small motif here or there can be decorative but these crazies are just, as my Daddy said: “showing their asses.” I know they do that, too, but his meaning was making fools of themselves. Tiny glittering rhinestones in the fool’s gold crown of colossal ignorance, to paraphrase Rush.
Yes I am an anti tattoo snob. My point is that tattoos at 18 and up makes a "sex object" woman look like garbage. There are no sexy women with tattoos. Damaged goods.
What is the attraction to having body piercing or extensive tattoos (not cheap)? If this attracts men to women, who is it they're attracting?
The ink within the skin is likely absorbed incrementally into the body. What's the body doing with it? Stuff that's supposedly 'inert' can become local irritants and a nidus for cancer to develop. When you're young, you don't worry about appearance in the future (if they make it to 70). Oh well, the price they pay for being 'stylish'.
All that ink, and the mysterious cocktail of chemicals within it, are going to infuse through the skin into the bloodstream, nice and gradually. A few moons later, a very unfortunate reaction might occur.
COPILOT: "Tattoo ink is generally considered safe when applied by licensed professionals, but it is not biologically inert—pigments can migrate from the skin into the lymph nodes and bloodstream, where they interact with the immune system. While most people experience no serious health effects, research shows that tattoo inks may contain heavy metals, preservatives, or nanoparticles that raise long-term safety questions."
Please share all your credible researched sources as to how the physical system deals with this and exactly what is in all these 'inks'. It would be helpful to have that ammunition for the readers of this to supply that information to those they hope to dissuade from getting tattoos.
I only have anecdotal professional experience of over 40 years to support my observations. If that information is out there we should share.
These people don't consider the consequences of their actions today. They "live in the now" and they'll deal with those consequences when they happen. At least that is what my daughter told me.
i can't believe these women give two hoots about "immigrants" -- they just want to "stick it to Trump" who is the ultimate masculine authority figure these. they have daddy issues.
They have daddy issues because men aren't permitted to be real daddies anymore. It also doesn't help that women screw whatever "man" will have them, get pregnant, have the baby and the man that screwed them is long gone.
Don't blame this on Dads. I know a lot of men who mourn their children because their wives divorced them and then poisoned the minds of their children against their fathers.
Yes, the almost invariable slandering of the ex. Women's darkest nature revealed. But there is more, much more. We know because women use the internet as the diary now. Many women are enraged when their husband gets sick. They can't stand to see him take a nap or sleep in. He's no better than a broken appliance! And yes, they don't like to see him having a good time with his friends, assuming he still has any.
The pundits of the Men's Movement estimate that perhaps 10% of women have the capacity to see men as human beings, as an end in themselves and not just servants or slaves. Just things to be used and abandoned.
One more, the narcissism of females today is growing. Simple, they are incapable of sharing themselves with a family, a man, children. Pregnancy is a bitch, childbirth is shattering. Can you imagine any of these Karens putting having a baby as worth sacrificing themselves for? No way. Why does it seem to be increasing? ????
And abortion today has become a means of birth control. Unfortunately, many women who have abortions as a means of birth control live the rest of their lives with feelings of guilt for these actions.
I'm not arguing or stating otherwise the merits of abortion, DM, just stating that many women today use it as a means of birth control. Now I know that a smart dude like you can agree with that.
No, I am not a preacher. Just an old jack mormon with an opinion.
They are lashing out. They are pissed off because their lives are shit and they know it. Feminism has screwed these ladies and turned their minds into mush. They are living a monthly battle between biology and society. Biology is winning but the battle is getting ugly. The fairer sex ain't so fair anymore. No wonder men aren't interested.
Women, white women especially, are nature or God's penultimate creation. There is nothing more beautiful than a feminine self caring woman. I don't care if she is a little heavy or a little thin. All women have inherent beauty if they will just care for themselves and have self pride. Most men don't care if their women are a little heavy or a little thin, they just want a woman to love and a woman who will get naked with him. It's not that complicated.
We are enduring the results of a feminism and a feminized society. The roles of men and women are inside out, upside down. Nature will correct this in time. It has already begun.
I should also add, most normal men want a woman who will take care of herself, get naked with him, but also will have his children.
Watched an ad on the teevee a few days back with a dude meeting with his financial planner to plan a safari to africa. The wife says they can also plan for a "baby." The man says "babies" and the woman firmly states "BABY" in a corrective manner.
Men still want children. They want women. They want to love a woman.
“It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies...” - George Orwell. 1984.
Appreciate all the "likes", but now I have found another version of this quote with an added ending: ......."and nosers-out of unorthodoxy." Wonder what that refers to?
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy."
"In "1984," George Orwell's portrayal of women is multifaceted, encompassing both critical and sympathetic elements. While he often falls into misogynistic stereotypes, the characters of Julia and Katherine serve to highlight the oppressive nature of the Party and the potential for resistance. Orwell's work invites readers to reflect on the roles of women in society and the impact of totalitarianism on personal relationships, making it a significant topic for discussion in feminist literary criticism."
I watched a video this morning where a reporter asks Minneapolis protesters about the Somali fraud. Half of them didn't know anything about it, and the other half said it was BS based on racism. Leftists have become incapable of rational thought.
Also, thanks for the heads up on the Elon discovery. I hadn't heard that, but I'm willing to bet it's true.
What I have heard alleged is he sponsored some "Jack Ryan" type stuff to stop election fraud overseas. Perhaps in forty years someone will include it in their memoirs.
Not only that, when the info produced became known, there should have been an investigation of the 2020 election exposing the tools used to steal that election.
Never happen. It would take away tools from the election tool boxes of all the scum in the Deep State.
I believe it will happen. Trump has the motive, means, and opportunity to expose it all. He regularly talks about election fraud. He’s not going to let it go. He wants vindication.
It strikes me that the people who are attacking the ICE officers are bullies. They would never see themselves that way. But they are actually in a position of power. They can pretty much say and do what they want, but the officers can fight back in only the most limited of circumstances
and with only limited force. ICE are likely to get in serious legal trouble if they fight back at all - even if they use reasonable force in response, they face media attack, public attack, lawsuits, and prosecution by overzealous liberal prosecutors. The bullying dynamic is even more the case when these men are being attacked by women - most men have been socialized not to hit women, and it’s never a good look when a man is using force against a woman. Especially a man in law-enforcement/military garb. The woke establishment takes the side of the protesters reflexively. The bullies know all this and are emboldened by it.
Maybe, but think of this: Would you like to be ICE Officer Ross right now? I think he has been put into hiding for his own protection. From the bullies.
When I was a young boy I would do sleepovers at my cousins house, a brother and sister. He was one year older ,she one year younger. Unlike other cousins and friends I knew, these two hated each other. Not typical sibling rivalry , but hatred. I saw first hand why the brother hated her. She would literally smack herself hard enough to show, then go to her dad and say see what he did. He would then deny to no avail while receiving the business end of a belt. Horrified beyond belief I happened to catch a glance at her, and the look of satisfaction on her face I will never forget. It's the same look I'm witnessing now on every leftist who says murder. murder !
Good article James, but I disagree on one point. You write " Becca will have that on her conscience forever, alas." Perhaps a sliver of a guilty conscious may fleetingly arrive, but it will be drowned out by the accolades being parceled out by the woke folk. She's more likely thinking what a wonderful person she is .
I had the same thing happen with my older sister. She had a temper and she was raging on me daring me to hit her. My Dad walked into the room the moment she was doing it. I expected my Dad to come down on me and much to my surprise he came down on my older sister. Hard. She never did that again.
My Dad was always very protective of his children, especially his sons. How I miss my father.
My younger sister, who I used to babysit with two other, younger siblings, tried to blackmail me when she was six, saying, "you better let us stay up or I'm going to tell Dad you were hitting us." So I let them stay up till my parents came home and explained the situation. Revenge is a dish best served cold, as they say.
Have to agree on Becca. Plus she stands to collect a cool million and a half from Go Fund Me in addition to whatever she can make as a paid spokesperson for chaos.
I had the same sort of sister, admitted to me years later. But remember, it is not the sister’s fault, she has learned to manipulate bad parentage to her benefit.
I still can't imagine a real mother actually leaving her kids behind to serve a false political narrative. Creepy stuff.
My single nurse mother told me long ago that we should abolish the 19th amendment after the election of Jimmy Carter. I was very young, but eventually understood what she meant.
Nailed it. They are a folies a deux x millions. Stepfordia. Cultists.
The first time they’ve felt like the “ in crowd”. Which makes them dangerous. They’ve never belonged. They were the ones who weren’t asked to the prom, asked out on a date, invited to parties, to sit at a lunch table, to join a team,participate in an event. They had no special attributes or talents, they went unnoticed or if noticed, with scorn or mockery. And now they’re getting even.
If those two are from Minnesota, they’re from the wrong side of the tracks, which isn’t saying much, given Minnesotans spend half their time holed up indoors because it’s too cold to be outside. They haven’t experienced the hustle bustle of NY, the sun and fun of Miami.. this is the high point of what is proving to be a short window that is their meager time on Earth.
Given Good’s history. Failed marriages, three children, two of which were abandoned, I’m guessing she slept with anybody who gave her the time of day. And was probably dumped the day following many times. I feel no pity for her. She didn’t care about her children. I don’t care about her. She was selfish.
Those (and more!) are modern maladaptations. They're the unintended consequences of tech and progress, and prioritizing the wants of the individual (not to forget the State and the Market!) over the basic needs of the species. Social experiments are failing right and left but instead of rolling a few things back and saying No once in a while everyone cries for moar. Moar, Baby! Moar, moar!
How about the 72 vaccine shots. The US vaccine schedule has tripled since 1986. When Kennedy and company recently brought the schedule in line with Denmark, Germany, and Japan, he was of course called a child killer. No mention of the fact that kids in those countries are routinely ranked as healthier than kids in the US.
Who can possibly know, understand, predict the psyche of women. More than permission, by which I assume he means "a meaning to life", I think it can happen to most Americans because we, society, are now fixated on politics. It replaced religion, relationships, community, social circles, clubs. It creates and validates right and wrong. It overrides reality and creates its own. All laws and justice are administered in relation to political party. Our entertainment complies with political trends and agendas. Sex is political. We are a giant Jim Jones Kool Aid chugging party. Welcome to the warmth of collective insanity. Drink up ladies.
One of the main tenets of modern feminism is that in order to be free and equal, women must behave like men. Against their natures and bodily limits. It ain't workin' out.
No, its not and nature is going to reclaim everything and make it back to what it should be. Women are baby factories. That is the entire nature of their creation. Incubators. Food factories. All for children. They are reminded this on a monthly basis when the cramps and menstrual cycles hit. Biology doesn't care about careers or degrees.
I kid my wife about women competing against themselves with appearance. Entire industries exist to support women trying to outdo other women.
High heels, especially spikes, cosmetics, nude dresses, crazy hairstyles, mutilating and dangerous plastic surgery, and maybe even tats and piercings.
Correct me if I am wrong. Mother Nature insists that women do this stuff to be attractive to and seduce men, and men are the aggressive folks that allow themselves to be seduced, willingly. Hormones are a bitch.
I am a woman who regrets that women have the right to vote, which gets me in trouble every time I say it. Politically, women are extremophiles: the nost radical group demographically are single, childless women, and the most conservative are married women with children.
This is a topic that makes me very sad. Men and women are natural allies and there is so much effort to separate us. Women are socialized to view men as if they are wayward, misbehaving women who need to be lectured and scolded back into proper behavior. And porn wires the male brain to see real women as sexualized, defective appliances. This is an unhappy state of affairs for everyone involved, and most of all for the children, increasingly rare, born of such union.
Fertility and fecundity in the west are in freefall, and most countries of the west have fallen over the demographic cliff, the point beyond which populations do not generally recover. Our leaders have flooded western countries with replacements, who do reproducce, ensuring civil war for all of us sooner or later. The west needs traditional women, mothers, desperately. We need traditional men, warriors, desperately. And it needs people passionately devoted to parenthood.
Whenever I look at homes for sale, I laugh at the fancy signs, in beautiful cursive, in the laundry that say "Laundry", the farmhouses with signs that say "Farmhouse", the kitchens with signs that say "Eat." I keep waiting for the sign above the marital bed that says (I feel olite this morning) "Procreate." Still waiting.
In any western country that survives this, or more accurately, any village, the old ways are coming back.
Wow. What a post! Fantastic. You sound like my wife, Gwennie. I bet you are a total babe as well. Thank you for putting up that fantastic comment. This is sincere, no sarcasm intended.
My wife doesn't want to vote. She always asks me who to vote for. I tell her to vote for who she wants and she insists on voting for who I vote for. Love that girl!
As I have thought before, you my friend are not the sharpest knife in the drawer. I do not disrespect religious people.
I merely ask questions of their Christian religion.
I don't mock people for being religious. I do however mock those for thinking their personal religion is exempt from mockery. Nothing is so sacred that it cannot be mocked. Religions deserve to be mocked.
An all-mighty God that is hurt by being mocked is not all that powerful
"Ridicule is the only weapon to be used against unintelligible religious propositions."-Thomas Jefferson,
--------
The Bible was written, revised and edited many times by the religious for the religious. The last thing it is, is truthful, reliable, unbiased, impartial or a neutral source. Folks that belief the entirety of Bible are willing to sacrifice their humanity on the altar of a book that they can't even prove.
Created sick and commanded to be well. The Christian believe that God made us imperfect and punishes us if we don’t get well. Commanded to love someone you fear. The very essence of sadomasochism. Showing everything that is so sick about Christian beliefs.
The stories in these old books made the Church rich. While the truth lay outside of all of them. To be fooled is not an insult, to stay in the foolery is an insult to oneself.
There are but two reasons for worshiping a God. The hope it can do something FOR you. And the constant fear it can and will do something TO you.
Having access to God doesn't mean having access to reality. If God creates souls he knows are damned to hell that means he's a total POS. And it makes you a POS if you believe in that!
---------
Everyone is born atheist. Religion has to be taught. Atheism doesn't have to be taught. Atheism is the only true default position when it comes to the question of 'God'. The only way to prove atheism wrong is by proving that a 'God' exists.
Atheists don't tell theists that they will be eternally tortured for their beliefs. Who's being more vitriolic?
The most vitriolic atheist doesn't hold a candle to theists who murder or even subjugate in the name of their god.
We all know that the ONLY one that could possibly prove God's existence to EVERYONE is God himself. If he's there he's hiding and doesn't want us to know him or him us. That's all I need to be convinced that the God of the Bible does not exist. The simple, honest, inevitable conclusion for any honest and unbiased thinker.
-------
God picked this version of the universe, and he will burn you forever because he loves you so much, after creating you to not believe. Yeah, makes sense...!
If God knew his creations would end up being tortured why create us?
Weird how any real "God" would still remain hidden after 1000's of years from mortals he demands worship from.
Christians: "Jesus loves you". Me: "Why did he tell you?"
I love the "you need to be looking for him" stuff. Quick question: "Why?" Christians really don't understand this: I don't believe in God. I do not believe there is anything for me to be looking for. They think that because belief in their God is important to them, it should be important to me. It's really not.
"You Only Have Two Choices: Obey God Or Burn In Hell Forever!?" There are other options, such as don't obey and don't burn in hell cuz it doesn't exist.
---------
I learnt a long time ago that once theists are cornered, they like to end the conversation, so they don’t have to deal with the answers they don’t like. You have to deal with people of differing views; I can be less confrontational if you’d like to be less smug.
----------
“The achievements of theologians don’t do anything, don’t affect anything, don’t mean anything. What makes anyone think that ‘theology’ is a subject at all?” - Richard Dawkins.
For me, the bottom line is always Truth. The question must always be; "Is it True?" That is the only way to make the best choices for ourselves, as well as our society. Even the most inoffensive religious belief systems introduce unsupported claims and take us away from the path of Truth, robbing us of the ability to make the best decisions in our lives.
"At what point does all of this stuff just break down and become just a lot of stupid shit that someone made up! They fucking made it up folks! It's make-believe!” – George Carlin
The lack of critical thinking in these activists and the general public outraged by what happened amazes me.
Ask these same people if they think it would be a good idea to harass, threaten, and obstruct a police officer making an arrest for a DUI or shoplifting and they would most definitely say "of course not".
So why in the hell do these people think it's okay to do this to ICE agents arresting illegal aliens? These people are brainwashed. Our media is complicit in the brainwashing. And many of our politicians cynically use these folks as useful idiots in their games of power.
But the question remains, where did they come from? What has happened to the USA that has grown such insanity? What do these people, not just the leaders really want?
The answers to this have been discussed over and over on this blog. IMHO, three causes:
The KGB defector, Yuri Bezmenov (sp?) laid it all out. America was done, cooked, by the 80's. Demoralized with the kids educated by the deadly enemies of mankind: the Corporations and the International Bankers. These are backers of Communism if you did but know!
You forgot the government with the Department of Education. Look at NYC, certainly Communist but hardly run by corporations. The corporations are currently trying to figure out how to handle Mamdani.
Oh? Who gave him the money to run? Campaigns are very expensive. The great foundations give the money. But where do they get it from? See my post above.
First on the list, IMHO, is the global socialists, with number one soldier, someone named Soros, same as the AG and judges in NYC. Until someone figures out how to stop this jerk, we will continue to decline.
Men have become reluctantly pussified, fear these “battle-axe” obese women, who tell their man when he’s “done” & for how long his punishment will last! Chastity belt and all….with nails in them😡! “ You’ll get laid when I say…..keep your greedy hands off my tattoo’d pudenda” “I’ll tell you when & how long”…..Do my tats make me look fat??? Or undesirable?? Next step is daring to defy legal orders from authority…..make themselves even less desirable and disgusting! I am disgusted with my own acquaintances that put me into their bunch by no fault of my own!
They should GET what they’re asking for…..a good ass kicking & an ass kicking!
The separation, hormone wise between men and women is not clear cut. It is actually a gradual spectrum with effeminate men and masculine women. Another complication is the personality defects of narcissism and power infects women as much as men. That is a new wrinkle to The Battle since feminism showed up.
The basic roles of men and women have been blurred so badly it is affecting the operations of sane society.
Number 1 and Number 3 for sure. Number 2 is more about indoctrination having replaced good education. The low IQ clowns posing as teachers waste time with moronic "social/emotional " cultural Marxist garbage instead of the three R's. I am continuously blown away at the idea our local schools supposedly spend $20-30K plus per student and few, as in like 10% can read at grade level. In Illinois they have once again lowered the standards while performance has dropped to negate their book keeping stunt. Most are innumerate as well.
In our local church schools, for a fraction of the public school cost, the children are usually reading and writing in kindergarten.
Most of these fantasy street fighters are veterans of many a demo. I suspect they are used to Minneapolis cops under orders to go lightly. They rely on the police's restraint.
But federal law enforcement officers are a different species. They don't take orders from Hizzhonor the Mayor. The ICE crew are used to dealing with seriously bad people: rapists, drug dealers, drunk truck drivers, murderers even. You block ICE personnel's way, they don't get the joke. Driving in their vicinity after you've been told to get out of the car triggers new rules.
Although I would very likely have detested Ms. Good if I met her, I am sorry her biography ended the way it did. She didn't earn three rounds to the head. But she was a classic example of that wheeze about bringing a knife to a gun fight.
And they aren’t just illegal aliens. There are some horrific criminals here. Why would these agitators protest this??
“ICE released a list this week detailing some of the most dangerous non-citizen criminals arrested during a major enforcement surge in Minnesota. The list includes individuals convicted of child rape, sexual assault of minors, sodomy, and multiple homicides, many of whom had final deportation orders dating back decades.”
One thing I've noticed sifting through the cringe content pushed out on Netflix and Apple TV: There often seems to be a take-charge lesbian around to handle the stunts previously performed by a Schwarzenegger, Stallone, or Willis hero from the 80s or 90s. The don't have much muscle, but lots of mouth. And they're often shown kicking the crap out of fellows we know could snap them like twigs. Perhaps this is where these wretched wiccans get their delusions of invincibility.
I watched an episode of that nasty "Star Trek Discovery" show and it had an older tiny Asian woman as the starship captain. I ran with the premise until she was beating the hell out of 300 pound Klingon warriors. She barely weighing 100 pounds. I couldn't watch another second of that awful show.
I watched a John Wick movie where Hollywood got it right and matched a smaller woman up against John Wick. He beat the shit out of her. She tried to put up a fight but she had no strength against him.
There is a commercial on the TV that shows a Georgia Bulldog fan doing the Georgia bark when his nasty hag of a boss (a woman) sits her Georgia Bulldog mug down on the table. She is the stereotypical girl boss. Arrogant, ugly, smug and looks at her male employee who is just trying to have a little college banter like he is a daft idiot. I hate that commercial.
A great cleansing is required to rid the body politic of this "bloodless coup" that's been going on for quite some time. Time to get back to baseline. What is baseline? Two sexes only, obey the law, respect your neighbor, seek decorum, etc... and here the corporations could be infinitely more responsible by leading with Goodwill, instead of trying to punish, profit and extract from those less fortunate, i.e. unilaterally lower interest card rates instead of waiting for the government to provide direction, stop with your disingenuous virtue signaling, etc. We're you morally bereft corporate leaders waiting for Trump to show you the way??
"American men are less and less good husband material — except at society’s tippy-top where they make obscene amounts of money in activities that are, frankly, pretty antisocial when you look hard — like, running monopolies, inducing the entire population into ill health, and selling out their country. "
A kid I went to high school with, who is, frankly, a moron, made millions of dollars buying the life insurance policies, for pennies on the dollar, from poor, sickly, down-on-their-luck people who are near death. He drives around in Ferraris and Lamborghinis and posts endlessly about living his "best life." He learned the scheme from a couple of Turkish immigrants who are now in prison. This is what "success" looks like in America today. Late stage capitalism.
America's business climate is essentially groups of powerful companies making money from people with less money. And it's getting worse and worse with derivatives, capitalizations, funds buying scads of single-family homes. Grossly anti-human activities.
Once you see the matrix for what it is - people marketing to you to take your money - it's impossible to unsee.
"Once you see the matrix for what it is - people marketing to you to take your money - it's impossible to unsee." As scales fall from the eyes, the gained knowledge cannot be 'undone'.
Nothing moves in a straight line. We're ever closer to the 'what happens next' part.
That is unchecked capitalism, rd3. You take advantage of your neighbor.
I have a few insurance agents in my neighborhood and in my local church. They make a ton of money and they do very little work for that money. Once someone buys the insurance policy, a chunk of that monthly premium is pure profit for the agent. What does the agent do to earn that money. Not a goddamned thing. And when the time comes that the client needs the insurance they do all they can to weasle out of paying. I hate insurances and insurance brokers. They rank up there with lawyers, producers of nothing and takers of everything.
That's what American capitalism is. A scam. Taking advantage of one to pay another.
I've been in a two-year long battle with State Farm over my roof. I've had State Farm for almost 20 years with no claims. Then, when I did have a claim, they fought me. I had to hire an independent adjustor and pay him 35%. So, in the end, I had to come out of pocket for $10k, when if State Farm would have just paid me to begin with, they would have been out the same money, but I would have been made whole. Instead, they shafted me and I had to drain my reserves paying for it.
Insurance companies are in the financial investment business. They take your (our) money and invest it. When it comes to paying claims, they try for the least $$ outlay to settle. They make a settlement offer (always a low-ball) hoping people will just accept it, however grudgingly. The idea is to keep as much $$ as possible on their side of the ledger.
Fighting them (negotiating?) takes a lot of time and energy. The game is rigged in their favor, as you (we) are trying to maximize the settlement amount in the midst of the loss, while they are trying to keep their cost of doing business low.
They sit in their offices collecting a salary (label as player A). The insured is suffering a loss, expending time, energy and $$ attempting to be made whole (label as player B).. So... would you prefer to be player A or player B?
Yep, they aren't about insuring, they are about making money and lots of it. Just watch a little teevee. Most of the ads you will see are insurance companies. They blow tens of millions of dollars on advertising each year. Many football stadiums are named after insurance companies. Insurance companies sponsor college bowl games every year to the tune of millions and millions of dollars, such as the Allstate Sugar Bowl.
If they have the kind of money to pay millions to name bowl games and stadiums after their business they should be lowering insurance rates or be faster at settling claims. Insurance companies are as big a fraud as you are ever going to find and we are the suckers. They prey upon our fear of "what could happen" and use that fear to pad their own pockets.
Unchecked Capitalism at its best. Take advantage of your fellow man so you can get rich.
Problems (issues) arise over time when individuals become too comfortable in their 'space', whatever it might be for the individual.
Then greed and power raise their ugly heads. Government becomes a tool for satisfying greed and increasing power.
It is the up/down axis (up = freedom, down = oppression)
Jefferson wanted a reset every twenty years. Keep freedom, suppress oppression.
Most individuals want to be left alone to "pursue happiness". While they are busy living life and wanting to be free, they (we) lose sight of 'freedom isn't free' because it requires work and constant vigilance to suppress the oppressors.
Thus, government isn't the best answer because both sides begin using it to further their 'agenda', whatever the 'agenda' might be. At this point the revolution is needed, about every 20 years, which leads to the conclusion every generation needs to fight government 'creep and control' in order to truly remain free.
Pursue happiness? You mean make money by screwing people over? That's what happiness is to Capitalist man. I love Jeff but he sounds like Mao with this quote.
If that's the best we can do, far better to go back to the stability of Monarchy. Clawing your way to the top produces exactly the wrong mentality and skill set needed to rule well.
Can’t blame females on the left for becoming lesbians. Look at the males of the democrat party and we see not a huge selection of men to choose from. Gavin Newsom, Tim Walz, mayors of Minneapolis and New York city not to mention all the effeminate dweebs in the congress. If they took off their shirts they’d look like a bunch of ironing boards with nipples.
The democrat party is a matriarchal party led by crack pot females with effeminate males in tow.
"When the arraignments begin, the derangements will ebb. Just watch and see."
We've been waiting years for something substantive to occur. It had better happen soon as this madness cannot go on much longer. Indeed, it may be too late.
The statute of limitations has been running on much of what was most obviously criminal. I am far from optimistic that those deserving prosecution will face it.
RICO? For example Nancy Pelosi spoke out about J6 the other day about Trump causing the Chaos that day. She thus updated the statute of limitations to 5 more years should she be indicted.
interesting if true that this would extend the SoL
Surely that is too logical and just to ever succeed!
Exactly.
That would be extremely fabulous!
Think of it like the Final Destination movies. There is a specific end determined for you, and you may dodge it for awhile, but eventually it will find you. So, yeah, they're dodging their final destination now, but eventually, by their own hands, it will find them. You have to wait and watch. It's always the little, seemingly insignificant things that bring down the giants.
Your favorite series or is Left Behind?
Not a lawyer, but I’ve read in several articles that because these crimes are all linked to the conspiracy to take Trump down, which they are, then the statute of limitations does not apply…seditious conspiracy will be the overriding charge, it seems.
Hang 'Em High !
That’s why Bondi was a terrible choice to start with and must be fired. The Comey/James case botched deliberately to let them skate. Why President Trump is okay with this? I wish I knew.
The worst. Bondi is to the DOJ what Barr, Bolton, Milley, Sessions, Wray Haspel, Fauci,Comey, McMaster, Pence, Kerner, Hill were to the first Trump admin combined.
Initially-Secret Report From 2013: Customs & Border Patrol Agents Got in Way of Vehicles, Then Used Deadly Force
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izonttr5Tp4
The shooting in Minneapolis has generated a great deal of interest, far and wide.
I just got a message from a friend who is currently on a fishing boat in the south Pacific and he heard about the shooting from locals in a drinking establishment after he got ino port a few days ago. Apparently it's been the talk of the village. A few hours ago he sent me this unsolicited comment:
"I had independently formulated the view from analysing the footage from multiple angles and cameras that Ross had positioned himself (just) in front of the vehicle as it moved back so that he could shoot the driver as soon as it started to move forwards. He is drawing (but not aiming) his gun as he steps in front of the reversing vehicle. The trajectory of the car is of course towards him as it begins to move but moving forward from a reverse means that the actually velocity of the (accelerating) car is quite low.
At this point he does the classic matador footwork firing down and at an angle through the windscreen. He then completes this classic footwork pivot (I have trained and used this many times with non projectile weapons - technically this is a 'nice' application) and fires twice into the drivers side window as the (now faster) car moves by. He then yells "fucking bitch" at the woman who he has shot and walks down after the car to check the outcome. His team then prevents immediate medical help from a passing doctor ensuring that the victim will bleed out before anyone else gets close to her.
The most critical information comes from Ross' cell phone footage.
Good makes eye contact, smiles and speaks nicely to her killer as he walks past her drivers side window taking footage. She is in fact trying to deescalate the situation although he has said nothing and she has not yet been called upon to get out of the vehicle. While the situation alone may have been enough I hypothesise that there is something about him that has scared her (and she is deliberately playing cool). He walks around back and passenger side and Good's wife gives him a verbal serve. Something like "You wanta come at us [now why this choice of words, I suspect she is also being triggered by something we cannot see, note phone/camera is held in his right hand] ... why don't you go get yourself some breakfast instead big boy".
Here IMO is the critical observation. At exactly this pont Ross changes the phone into his left hand as he continues to walk around the front passenger side and the front of the car to where he will fire his first shot. That is at the is point when he has been riled by jibes from Good's wife, and before he then steps in front of the car, and with absolutely no situational cues at that point, he begins the process of clearing the path of his right hand to draw his pistol and steps in front of the reversing vehicle.
Now see this police report on the use of this technique as a widespread practice to set up and justify use of lethal force by DHS agents in 2012. Note that Ross joined DHS in 2013.
Initially-Secret Report: Customs & Border Patrol Agents Got in Way of Vehicles, Then Used Deadly Force
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izonttr5Tp4
At this point I conclude that this was a premediated homicide deliberately carried out in such a fashion as to be presented as a defensive act in a split second by an officer in fear of his life. Very neat indeed."
I would add a few points:
It's been claimed that the wheels of Good's vehicle were "spinning" on ice after she started the vehicle.
There is good reason to belueve that people often misinterpret engine revs or slight wheel slip as “spinning”, especially on ice.
If the wheels were spinning, would it materially change the analysis?
Mechanically / physically
• A vehicle transitioning from reverse to forward on ice will, by definition, have very low initial forward velocity, regardless of wheel spin.
• Wheel spin on ice reduces actual force transfer to the ground.
• A spinning wheel indicates loss of traction, not effective acceleration toward a target.
• A vehicle with spinning wheels is less capable of controlled directional threat, not more.
This is key:
Wheel spin does NOT equal increased danger to a person who has chosen to step into the vehicle’s projected path.
Legally / use-of-force doctrine
In most use-of-force frameworks (including US federal LE):
• The threat is evaluated based on objective imminence and necessity.
• An officer creating the danger (stepping in front of a slow-moving or traction-limited vehicle) undermines a self-defense claim.
• Courts routinely distinguish between:
• a driver accelerating toward an officer who is already trapped, and
• an officer moving into the vehicle’s path.
• Spinning tyres do not strengthen a self-defense argument if the officer had space, time, and alternatives.
• In some cases, they weaken it, because they suggest low traction and low effective threat.
Bottom line
Even if tyres were spinning, that fact alone would not materially justify lethal force if the officer voluntarily placed himself in front of the vehicle during a low-speed transition.
This is a classic post-hoc justification tactic:
• It reframes loss of traction as aggression.
• It shifts attention from officer movement choices to vehicle mechanics.
• It relies on public misunderstanding of vehicle dynamics.
From an analytical standpoint:
• It does not rebut the central claim that the officer placed himself in danger.
• It addresses perception, not necessity.
Could spinning wheels mean Ross was “saved” by reduced acceleration?
Yes, in a purely physical sense, reduced traction reduces acceleration.
Does that support a claim the driver attempted to strike him at high speed?
No — not without additional, independent evidence of intent, such as:
• deliberate steering toward him,
• sustained acceleration once traction improved,
• lack of alternative escape path,
• officer already being trapped.
Wheel spin alone cannot bear that inferential weight.
Bottom-line calibration (very important)
• The defense argument that Good attempted to strike Ross with the vehicle and failed only because loss of traction limited acceleration is permissible but thin.
• The prosecution rebuttal is structurally stronger than the defense argument, because:
• it aligns physics with use-of-force doctrine,
• it centers officer agency rather than vehicle mechanics,
• it avoids speculative counterfactuals.
If this were before a jury, the “spinning wheels saved him” claim would not be decisive — and could easily backfire.
How a prosecutor / civil plaintiff would dismantle that argument
Core rebuttal
Wheel spin weakens, not strengthens, the claim of imminent lethal threat — especially where the officer created the danger.
Step-by-step rebuttal
1. Wheel spin proves loss of control, not homicidal intent
• On ice, throttle input is often necessary merely to regain steering authority.
• Spinning wheels are consistent with:
• attempting to reposition,
• attempting to escape,
• attempting not to stall.
• There is no reliable inference of intent to strike from wheel spin alone.
2. Low traction = low effective threat
• Wheel spin means reduced force transfer.
• The vehicle’s actual forward velocity — not engine noise or RPM — is what matters.
• A traction-limited vehicle is less capable of controlled targeting.
3. Officer-created jeopardy doctrine
• If the officer voluntarily stepped into the vehicle’s path:
• He manufactured the appearance of danger.
• Self-defense law does not reward self-created emergencies.
• Wheel spin does not cure that defect.
4. Counterfactuals are legally weak
• “If the road weren’t icy” is speculative.
• Courts assess what was, not what might have been.
• The actual conditions at the moment matter.
The decisive issue neither side can escape
This is the hinge point, legally and analytically:
Who controlled the geometry of the encounter at the critical moment?
If:
• the officer had lateral space,
• the vehicle was slow or traction-limited,
• and the officer stepped into the projected path,
then wheel spin does not rescue a self-defense claim.
In fact, it often damages it, because it shows:
• the vehicle was struggling to move effectively,
• the threat window was not instantaneous,
• escape was available.
That’s a whole lotta excuse for the series of bad decisions she made that left her dead.
He needs to be arrested or indicted prior to being tried, and only in a federal jurisdiction. Neither will happen. This will not be a George Floyd moment. But even though they will be trying their best to wrest it away, the democrats will not win on this.
A huge deal is approaching this month. The Dems next move is to stop the exportation of their invasion by shutting down the government again. Like the demonstrators, the Deep State, waiting in DC, is full of Dem thugs waiting to do damage to Trump and the rest of the anti-government folks.
One thing is a constant, if the press would not swarm to these “protests” day after day, and do a Lois Lane by encouraging the thugs, they would not happen.
Sidebar
A Lois Lane is an act designated by Lois in Superman 1, “ If there is no news to report, it is our job to create the news”.
Well said, shame that the gene pool had not been chlorinated before procreating.
That lengthy analysis is a classic example of forensic crash reports. Wrong outcomes often occur when incorrect decisions continue to be made incrementally which build up and eventually result in a catastrophe, often in a matter of seconds.
Automobile, airplane even crossing the street, happens all the time.
Nothing new here, she fucked up, admit it.
A year ago, a guy took his pick up truck and plowed into reverlers in New Orleans. I am dumbstruck by how dumb anyone is to believe vehicles aren't potential weapons and an officer will treat it as such.
Agree dk, way too many words for Natural Selection 🤔
Unfortunately, Ross will probably have to tell it to the judge, insofar as the prosecution should very easily be able to demonstrate that there is a facie case and argue that a properly instructed jury could convict. What's not clear yet is what court he will be tried in and when.
He won't be tried.
Check out the youtube video. You may or may not be correct but if you're a sadist, enforcing sadism or spineless sadism subtype, and killing or harming wrongdoers gives you a boner, and you need a pretext for a thrill kill, it's a neat way to do it.
Initially-Secret Report From 2013: Customs & Border Patrol Agents Got in Way of Vehicles, Then Used Deadly Force
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izonttr5Tp4
Enforcing sadism
Including compulsive features:
Hostility sublimated in the "public interest," cops, "bossy" supervisors, deans, judges; possesses the "right" to be pitiless, merciless, coarse, and barbarous; task is to control and punish, to search out rule breakers.
Spineless sadism
Including avoidant features: Insecure, bogus, and cowardly; venomous dominance and cruelty is counterphobic; weakness counteracted by group support; public swaggering; selects powerless scapegoats.
Tyrannical sadism
Including negativistic features:
Relishes menacing and brutalizing others, forcing them to cower and submit; verbally cutting and scathing, accusatory and destructive; intentionally surly, abusive, inhumane, unmerciful.
Explosive sadism
Including borderline features:
Unpredictably precipitous outbursts and fury; uncontrollable rage and fearsome attacks; feelings of humiliation are pent-up and discharged; subsequently contrite.
Common sense dictates that if a LEO tells you to do something, you comply, and if it is wrong or illegal, you sue them into oblivion.
The rest of that screed is pointless.
You appear to be someone in need of some actual psychological help.
Read and learn from one qualified to educated you: https://open.substack.com/pub/shipwreckedcrew/p/minneapolis-is-not-even-a-close-call?r=1fxdc&utm_medium=ios&shareImageVariant=overlay
Incredible article. Thanks, dk
Essential reading for all.
Beat me to it, dk. I read this yesterday and it looked compelling to me, if the writer's points of law are correct. Like Dennis says, essential reading! Sick of all the uninformed blahblahblah.
Good was violating 18 U.S.C. § 111, which prohibits “assaulting, resisting or impeding federal officers." Can involve up to 1 year in prison.
There’s also 18 U.S.C. § 371 — “Conspiracy to commit offense against the United States,” which carries five years in prison."
The funders and organizers of these harassment campaigns (handing out manuals with tactics to use, organizing online, encouraging protestors to use their cars to block federal officers, etc.) could fall into that category.
Don't kid yourself for a minute. The funders of this want a confrontation to happen where one of their useful idiots is harmed. Then they can escalate their narrative and make the story about the federal response. They don't care about criminal illegal aliens being deported and they don't care about protestors being harmed. This is a method to expand their ideology using well meaning but misguided and naive people to be their "resistors."
Federal Agents have pretty much left the protestors alone. That may change now.
Of course they care about their voters, workers, and troops being deported. Good post otherwise.
So they are stopping an invasion that is pointed at destruction of all things AmeriCAN. The “troops” need to be sent home. The workers need to be sent home to improve their own countries.
As most are not supposed to be voters, the vote will become less corrupt with the removal of the invaders.
Can we find a way of deporting the Ult- Left?
No indictment. Ashley Babbitt redo.
Not at all, Ashley Babbit had no weapon and was not in the middle of assaulting anyone, she was straight up murdered by a black Fed who got away with it, and that was Racial 100%!
Very similar.
Nope not at all.
Only an idiot would even try that connection.
All that to say, it doesn't matter; she violated so many rules of driving and the law.
Pedestrians have the right of way, period, end of story.
Had she shut the engine off and complied, she would have been arrested for obstruction.
Better yet, had they not shown up to protest and obstruct with their deadly weapon, aka a car, she would still be alive.
The point is, if you are going to protest, then do so from a sidewalk, not from a car and never drive in a manner where a pedestrian, armed or otherwise, is in the path.
EXACTLY. Protest from the sidewalks. The minute you insert yourself into the action, BEWARE, you might die.
She broke the social contract by protesting unlawfully. She created and escalated chaos. All the other minutia is irrelevant, really.
The stench of this "event" is overpowering the George Floyd fiasco. It doesn't take a very deep dive into some details along with noticing the out-of-proportion response in the media to confirm something is rotten in Denmark. Or is that Greenland? Start with the obvious question of why does "her" vehicle come tagged with out-of-state plates?
Operation Chaos continues, at the expense of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness by the non-government-agent portion of the population. When I attended college in Minneapolis in the early 1980s, I did not imagine the initial gay parades (or was it the music from Prince?) would lead us to this. It's a purple haze/rain all right.
This makes me sad.
The parades broke the laws of life. It was a fall and like all falls it accelerates. The wise Russians break up such things. The police arrive and help the citizens in so doing.
Well, when Intel is running the parade/protest, the police (another branch of Intel) won't show up to help the honest everyday citizens, who are the real targets and victims.
It would not have been to the Puppet Master's advantage to have a new administration completely sweep away the existing psyops dealing with immigration and wokeness. But Trump was allowed to enjoy a brief "There's a new sheriff in town" stage, falsely giving the MAGA drones some hope, which is now being crushed as it becomes obvious it's business as usual.
The U.S. Republic represents many obstacles for the Globalists, and they're continuing to break it down and collapse it. A Civil War like the last one advanced their goals - it would not be surprising to see another.
In the army we had a saying: "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes". Lesbian are nearly always obnoxious, arrogant, and mentally ill. It's a better world without her/him/it.
Learned from watching protesters in Chicago blocking the Dan Ryan Expressway or the many during other protests where they congregated in the streets to stop traffic. Using the vehicle seems like a unique and more dangerous tactic as it is a potential weapon.
After seeing what happened to Reginald Denny, I would drive through protesters rather than risk them pulling me or my loved ones out of the car.
Threat assessment skill is needed, and each instance requires one to have their eyes open.
In the Reginal Denny case, I would have blasted the horn and punched it into first gear based simply on the crowd and the theatrics involved with that crowd.
Ben
It is playing chicken, to see who blinks first. It is the cops job to not blink and uphold the law. Our lovely Leftist society just uses the incidents that WILL happen. Sickos.
"Pedestrians have the right of way, period, end of story."
Well ... which is it?
The right: A crazy woman got shot because she was acting stupid.
The left: Our side got shot by their side. Context besides that doesn't matter.
I know you're stupid, but even you can't be this stupid.
Case in point, Phil Denter walks out into traffic and makes an ass of himself.
Yes, he probably makes an ass of himself in the real world, not just here, but only if he knows he won't get beaten up.
Do you drive around him or over him?
Is it Phil harmlessly standing on a soapbox telling everyone crazy shit about Trump? Drive around, of course, with a nasty honk, and a yelled "get out of the road, dumbass!"
Or does he have a brick and thirty other people pulling white people out of cars and beating the shit out of them?
Is there a safe path around him and his mostly peaceful friends?
Your choices again run him over or get pulled out of your car and beaten to a pulp or even murdered. If there is no path out, hit the horn and tell him, I will run your ass over, get the fuck out of the way.
Rioters are not pedestrians!
The law regarding driving through riots is complex and varies significantly by state, but the general consensus is that drivers do not have the right to deliberately drive into a crowd unless they reasonably believe their life is in imminent danger. Several states have enacted specific laws that provide civil or criminal immunity to drivers in certain circumstances.
General Legal Principles
Self-Defense: In all states, the use of deadly force (which can include driving a vehicle into a person) is legally justified only when a driver reasonably believes it is necessary to protect themselves or others against death or serious bodily injury.
Duty to Retreat: Some state laws have "stand your ground" principles, but a driver generally does not have a duty to retreat if doing so would put them in more danger.
Obstructing Traffic is Illegal: Protesters do not have a First Amendment right to block public roadways and impede traffic. Unlawful obstruction of a public street is typically an arrestable offense, and in some states, a felony.
The right: A crazy woman got shot because she was acting stupid.
The left: Our side got shot by their side. Context besides that doesn't matter.
Prosecution Theory of the Case
(Officer-Created Danger and Unjustified Lethal Force)
Introduction
Members of the jury, this case is not about hindsight. It is about choices — choices made by a trained federal agent in the seconds before he fired the fatal shots. The evidence will show that the defendant created the very danger he then claimed justified lethal force, and that his use of deadly force was neither necessary nor reasonable under the circumstances.
1. The Encounter Begins Without an Imminent Threat
You will see video from multiple angles, including the defendant’s own phone recording.
That footage shows:
• The decedent seated in her vehicle.
• Calm verbal interaction.
• Eye contact, smiling, and an apparent attempt to de-escalate.
• No commands given to exit the vehicle.
• No weapon displayed.
• No sudden or aggressive movement by the driver.
At this stage, there is no imminent threat — and no lawful basis for deadly force.
2. The Defendant Anticipates Lethal Force Before Any Threat Emerges
As the defendant walks around the vehicle, something important happens.
He transfers his phone from his right hand to his left.
This is not accidental.
This is not reflexive.
It clears his dominant hand — the hand he uses to draw his firearm.
This occurs before the vehicle moves forward in any meaningful way and before any credible threat to his life exists.
The prosecution will submit that this action demonstrates anticipation, not reaction.
3. The Defendant Voluntarily Places Himself in the Vehicle’s Path
Next, the defendant moves to the front of the vehicle.
The evidence will show:
• He had lateral space.
• He was not pinned.
• He was not boxed in.
• He was not struck or dragged.
Instead, he steps into the projected path of a vehicle that is transitioning from reverse to forward on an icy surface — a maneuver that necessarily involves low initial speed and limited traction.
This is a critical point.
Law enforcement training universally teaches officers not to place themselves in front of vehicles precisely because doing so manufactures danger.
4. The Vehicle’s Movement Does Not Justify Deadly Force
The defense may argue that the vehicle posed a deadly threat.
But the evidence will show:
• The vehicle was moving slowly.
• Any wheel spin indicates loss of traction, not effective acceleration.
• Loss of traction reduces control and speed.
• The defendant was able to step laterally as the vehicle passed.
A slow-moving, traction-limited vehicle does not present the same imminent lethal threat as a vehicle accelerating rapidly toward a trapped officer.
And importantly, any danger that did exist was created by the defendant’s own positioning.
5. The Shooting Itself Shows Control, Not Panic
You will hear about the firing sequence:
• An initial shot fired downward through the windshield.
• Follow-up shots fired through the driver’s side window as the vehicle moves past.
This is not indiscriminate firing.
This is targeted, sequential engagement.
Such controlled firing is inconsistent with a claim of blind panic or unavoidable split-second fear.
6. Post-Shooting Conduct Undermines a Self-Defense Claim
After the shooting, the defendant:
• Uses hostile language toward the wounded driver.
• Walks after the vehicle.
• Does not immediately render aid.
While post-event conduct does not alone determine guilt, it is relevant to assessing whether the defendant was acting out of genuine fear for his life.
7. The Law Does Not Excuse Officer-Created Danger
The law is clear.
An officer may not:
• Create a dangerous situation,
• Step into harm’s way,
• And then claim self-defense when that danger materializes.
Deadly force is justified only when it is necessary to prevent imminent death or serious bodily harm — not when an officer manufactures the appearance of such a threat.
Conclusion
The prosecution is not required to prove that the defendant planned this encounter hours or days in advance.
What the evidence does show is that:
• He anticipated the use of lethal force,
• He placed himself in the vehicle’s path,
• He fired at a moment when retreat and avoidance were available,
• And he did so under circumstances that do not meet the legal standard for self-defense.
We will ask you to find that the defendant’s actions were unreasonable, unjustified, and criminal.
The legal standard is the objective reasonableness of the action from the perspective of the officer, not your thesis-volume justification of something that occurred within a couple of seconds while you get to analyze for hours while sitting on your comfortable couch reviewing videos.
Minnesota Statute 609.066, signed into law by Gov. Tim Walz in 2020:
Subd. 2.Use of deadly force.
(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 609.06 or 609.065, the use of deadly force by a peace officer in the line of duty is justified only if an objectively reasonable officer would believe, based on the totality of the circumstances known to the officer at the time and without the benefit of hindsight, that such force is necessary:
(1) to protect the peace officer or another from death or great bodily harm, provided that the threat:
(i) can be articulated with specificity;
(ii) is reasonably likely to occur absent action by the law enforcement officer; and
(iii) must be addressed through the use of deadly force without unreasonable delay; or
(2) to effect the arrest or capture, or prevent the escape, of a person whom the peace officer knows or has reasonable grounds to believe has committed or attempted to commit a felony and the officer reasonably believes that the person will cause death or great bodily harm to another person under the threat criteria in clause (1), items (i) to (iii), unless immediately apprehended.
I live in the land of ice and I can squarely call bullshit on #2 and that calls into question all your argument. She was an angry, irrational woman impeding a law enforcement operation. Put yourself in that Honda listening to your boyfriend talking smack to an armed Fed. Would you be that stupid? Would you believe you could drive, wheels spinning on ice within 180 compass degrees of his direction? Put down the mai-tai and sober up.
Leads one to question how drunk or stoned these people are?
The right: A crazy woman got shot because she was acting stupid.
The left: Our side got shot by their side. Context besides that doesn't matter.
Yes, and after all the years of abuse we've silently taken from these left wing bastards; I want to see them all choke on their own blood. Does that make me a bad person?
Nope.
What if the wheels had stopped spinning and grabbed paving?
You're WOKE, not AWAKE!!!
You just outed yourself.
You are a leftist. The US supported the communists in WW2 and fought against the political right. The Nazis were not, as idiots like you believe, "socialist" or "left wing."
The claim that the German Nazis were “socialist” or “left-wing” because the word socialist appears in Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP) is a name-based fallacy that collapses under historical, ideological, and empirical scrutiny.
Below is a clear, evidence-based rebuttal.
1. Names are propaganda, not ideology
Political movements often mislabel themselves for strategic appeal.
The Nazis deliberately used “socialist” and “workers” to attract working-class voters away from Marxist parties, which were genuinely left-wing and far more popular among German workers in the early 1930s.
Once in power, the Nazis destroyed actual socialist and communist organizations.
Historical parallels:
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is neither democratic nor a republic.
The Patriot Act undermines civil liberties.
“People’s” or “Workers’” in a party name has often been used by explicitly anti-left regimes.
A word in a title is not dispositive; policy, doctrine, and practice are.
2. The Nazis violently eradicated the Left
If the Nazis were left-wing, their first actions make no sense.
Immediately after taking power (1933):
The Communist Party (KPD) was banned
The Social Democratic Party (SPD) was banned
Trade unions were dissolved and replaced with a state-controlled labor front
Thousands of leftists were imprisoned or murdered (Dachau’s first inmates were communists and social democrats)
This was not an intra-left dispute; it was extermination.
3. Nazi “socialism” rejected core socialist principles
Socialism—across its major traditions—centers on:
Class analysis
Internationalism
Worker control or ownership of the means of production
Opposition to inherited hierarchy
Nazism rejected all of these.
Nazi ideology instead emphasized:
Racial hierarchy, not class struggle
Ultranationalism, not international solidarity
Private property, provided owners served the state
Authoritarianism, not worker empowerment
Hitler explicitly rejected Marxism as “Jewish” and viewed class politics as corrosive to national unity.
4. The Nazi economy was not socialist
The Nazis did not abolish capitalism.
Major industries (Krupp, IG Farben, Siemens, Thyssen) remained privately owned
Industrialists profited enormously under Nazi rule
The regime privatized several state-owned enterprises (railways, steel, banks)—a fact noted by historians such as Götz Aly and Adam Tooze
What existed was state-directed capitalism, not socialism:
Private ownership + state goals + repression of labor
This is closer to corporatism or fascism, not the left
5. The “left wing of the Nazi Party” was purged
Early on, some figures (e.g., Gregor Strasser) promoted a pseudo-anti-capitalist rhetoric.
What happened to them?
They were murdered or sidelined, especially during the Night of the Long Knives (1934)
Hitler explicitly chose industrial elites and the military over any anti-capitalist faction
This decisively settled the question of what kind of regime Nazism was.
6. Every serious historian classifies Nazism as far-right
This is not controversial in academic history.
Nazism is universally classified as:
Far-right
Fascist
Ultranationalist
Racialist
Anti-liberal and anti-Marxist
This consensus spans:
Liberal historians
Conservative historians
Marxist historians
The “Nazis were left-wing” claim appears almost exclusively in modern polemics, not scholarship.
Bottom line
Nazism was not socialist in any meaningful sense.
It was a far-right, fascist, racial-nationalist ideology that:
Destroyed the Left
Preserved private capital
Rejected class politics
Replaced socialism with racial myth and authoritarian rule
The presence of the word “socialist” in the party’s name tells us about Nazi propaganda, not Nazi ideology.
It was NATIONAL Socialism and had nothing to do with Marxist Socialism that was and is funded by the International Bankers.
So what's you gripe? Are you against nations like the Bankers are? Against Whites - like the Bankers are (google the Kalergi plan for more info)?
I would suggest you take a reading comprehension course, except that you can't put a pint of milk in a half-point bottle. You fuckheads commenting here, communists almost every single last one of you, think that national socialism is left. Wrong!
I would suggest that Lugh can not only read but is coherent.
You just attacked a like-minded thinker.
You're so busy fighting everyone, you don't have a clue about the pulse of this comments section.
I suggest shutting up and lurking for a few weeks.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but Hitler was a puppet also supported and raised up by the Rothschilds, Wall St and the British deep state.
https://davidahughes.net/wall-street-the-nazis-and-the-crimes/
The author is a former Senior Lecturer in International Relations, with one of his two PhDs being in German studies. He does proper academic research. I recommend the book.
We've been done this road before. They put money on all the numbers on the Roulette wheel so they never completely lose; a foot in every door. But they do prefer some outcomes. Do you really think they wanted the agrarian South to hold off the industrial North? Of course not, BUT they gave money to the South too. Now apply this to WW2. Are you up to it? I mean can you even see the analogy I just made?
If they really wanted the South to win, they would have given far more money and brought in British troops too.
Do you really think Wall Street wanted the Nazis to win? How does that tie in with Globalism and blending Whites out of existence? Make an argument, a real one. I'm listening.
A biased account of the scene. Immediately inaccurate when it states the “killer” was at the driver’s window, but somehow was also on the other side of the car with the wife.
It forgets one thing, she put herself at risk by being there in the first place. Purposely aggravating the situation in a highly charged scene was almost suicidal. The officer had been involved in a drive away three weeks before, he was a loose cannon. Look closely, he is filming the scene, especially the driver, up to the point that she shifts into drive, then pulls the gun, intending to use it. There is no doubt about that.
A rule for these “protestors”, “ When you mess with the bull, you get the horn”. When approached by a cop, of any sort, do what you are told. They do not have those sidearms for no reason. Society selects cops to protect itself from the thugs.
These women were playing chicken with the cops and sometimes violence will occur. They had fun, until it wasn’t.
ICE is only at fault for not bringing more officers for crowd control and throwing all the obstructers in a paddy wagon.
The French riot cops...
OK, time to bring out the high-pressure cold-water cannons!
Situation immediately under control!
Dennis
Can you imagine the headlines on ABC, NY Times or WaPo after cold water cannons? The real enemy of this republic is its press.
The Ice. The Ice! Our ancestors grew strong in the ice and cold. See WEL, the Doctrine of the Eternal Ice.
And what ever happened to using dogs?
Dennis 100% agree!
She wasn't trying to de escalate the situation. That was a manipulative tactic as described in their protest/resist manuals. Taunt and push things to the edge of being illegal then when confronted act sweet and non confrontational as if you're innocent. It's bullshit. Those two were tracking and harassing ICE all day. They just didn't believe there would be any consequences.
Let prosecutors prepare a case and put it in front of triers-of-fact.
Where? Doing it in Minnesota is a waste of time and effort.
This is becoming a states right vs. the Feds.
See: Whiskey Rebellion, civil war 1, the south and civil rights, etc. It is very close in scale to the time just prior to Ft. Sumter.
A lot of what the future portends will be decided by SCOTUS this year.
Triers-of-face . . . AGAIN, the legal standard is the reasonable objectiveness of the action FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE OFFICER. This has stood the test of time up to the Supreme Court for decades. Play "trier-of-fact" all you like.
From @dk above: https://open.substack.com/pub/shipwreckedcrew/p/minneapolis-is-not-even-a-close-call?r=1fxdc&utm_medium=ios&shareImageVariant=overlay
Suggest your friend stick to his fishing excursion and suck up all the natural Vitamin D available. It may help with his mental clarity.
There was no friend, and it is pretty obvious from the endless posts.
I took note of the British spelling of ‘tires’, “tyres”. Who? Where? Why?
I only cite it as an example of how the incident is being appraised even in backwaters around the world. The interesting thing is that none of those natives in those south Pacific islands or in most places want to come to America. The way they seeit is thst the US is full of illegals raping and murdering and based on their experiences with American tourists they think native born Americans, whether cops or civilians are not really any less likely to be sadistic psychopaths.
C’mon, do not be naive. Millions of traffic stops, or other cop encounters and here is one that went bad, one. After what I see in the world, the USA is still one of the safest places to be. You sound like Lois Lane and the press, make things a hundred times worse than it is. Put yourself in the cops position, he is filming the event, when the car switches to forward movement. What would you do? In a split second.
John, I agree. From @dk above: https://open.substack.com/pub/shipwreckedcrew/p/minneapolis-is-not-even-a-close-call?r=1fxdc&utm_medium=ios&shareImageVariant=overlay
"After what I see in the world, the USA is still one of the safest places to be."
Not really, John. At 5.763 the USA is 65th in homicides per 100,000. Using that safety measure, there are 139 countries safer than the USA (including Cuba and Afghanistan!).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate
Just stay away from the cities.
🎥🎥 Cameras don't lie. But there will be no indictment. Ashley Babbitt redo.
From @dk above: https://open.substack.com/pub/shipwreckedcrew/p/minneapolis-is-not-even-a-close-call?r=1fxdc&utm_medium=ios&shareImageVariant=overlay
Thanks for reposting, Dennis. Everyone needs to read this before shooting off his or her mouth.
I don't give a rats ass what the South Pacific Islanders think.
Well the US is rank 30 in cross national IQ comparisons and you're probably well below the mean, as a result of syphilis from all the other guys you've fellated or from the effects of the spike protein on your frontal lobes, after being vaxxed, either through injection or through shedding, with the Trump mRNA death shots. So of course you and other traitors to your race who celebrate when white women are shot by people married to non-white immigrants wouldn't give a rats ass because that would be too great a cognitive load. Go off now and hero worship your Obama or your Karl Marx that Lincoln wrote love letters to.
Speaking of IQ:
You my friend do not have a high enough IQ to participate in this comment thread for rational adults.
No manners either.
And a sick potty mouth.
Poor you
Fu@king arm chair quarterback. Spin it until you win it. There was no requirement for the officer to move at all. It was his legal duty to stop the vehicle. It is part of the job description.
If someone starts chasing the officer with deadly force, is it his responsibility to run? To de-escalate? Not when I was on the street. Not now in any but the most woke jurisdictions.
Crowd control.
Well E. I hope ICE backs him up and doesnt throw him to the wolves like the City of Minneapolis did with Derek Chauvin.
BRH,
In the bad old days in Oakland, if your actions were within Departmental regulations and policy, you would be backed to the hilt, public opinion and politics be damned.
If you were without that policy, you would be thrown to the wolves...prosecuted even. I was a principal in one of the largest internal affairs investigation in the history of the department (up to that point), and the Department backed me up. I had a buddy from recruit school, however, who had his apartment raided by vice, where they found a few marijuana seeds in his vacuum cleaner...terminated with a felony conviction.
Trump's ICE will back the agent.
Who can forget the Somali cop who shot past his partner's nose to kill an Australian yoga teacher in her night gown who had called them in the first place. White, in a white gown - she must have seemed like a ghost to this worthy. He made a brief statement and that was it for 8 months. No nothing from the state. That's Somali power in the Twin Cities. They came for him eventually, but I have no idea if the trial ever happened or what as the outcome.
Marlin
Mada any trips to the coast lately? Are we going underwater yet?
Asking because your comments are worth 1000 climate experts.
Nah, been staying close to home for winter, JAZ. Been working around the property mostly, clearing brush and removing a few trees. Sometime I'm holed up here for days on end. I'm pretty sure when I drive down to the coast on the first mild day of the season -- sometime in mid march, a 40 mile trip -- the shoreline will look pretty much how I left in October. One weather variation that I do notice is more high wind days than in the past. Not sure what it means, if anything.
How are things in the West?
Phoenix is warm, 70s as highs and 40-50 as the lows. Flagstaff though looks like Colorado with the ski area doing well. Our winter has been wet, ha, we had two storms come through from the Pacific, unusual. We never have a lot of wind, as we usually do not have the storms. Lots of Sun.
They all think that large muscular Blacks can be arrested without force. As one cop said in an article, You try it.
Saw a great clip of three police women trying to arrest a large Black man. When sweet talking wouldn't work, he just shook them off almost effortlessly.
Women who grow up without brothers often have no idea how much stronger men are compared to women.
In Oakland, when I was working, there was only one female sworn police officer. She was large and formidable, and she worked in the Juvenile section...no patrol...ever.
Thanks for the long and thoughtful comment. There is a lot to process as time goes on and more information comes out.
Maybe it's because in my youth I was a crazy hippie chick and had my own nasty run-ins with the cops, I have never been a fan of police fetishization wherein they can do no wrong.
I am MAGA all the way and will support President Trump forever, but I am getting a little tired of the "law and order" crap where no one on our side is allowed to question anything done by the police.
My first reaction to this shooting was that she totally deserved it and got what was coming to her. Maybe because I am rightfully prejudiced against women such that I cannot stand bitches like Renee Good, that I was willing to jump on that bandwagon. I thought this was FAFO all the way.
But there are two sides to every story, sometimes three.
Thank you, NY Nanny. My feelings 100%.
Thanks Kathy. I can't believe what mixed feelings I have about this. I would never say this was "murder" by any means. And she was really "asking for it" in so many ways. But somehow it doesn't seem right that she paid for her stupidity and derangement with her life.
Years ago I was part of a group that was trying to abolish the corrupt police department in our NY town. This was way before BLM and defund the police.
We didn't need the local police force because we had other coverage by the sheriff and state troopers.
To say that our PD behaved badly would be an understatement. They were violent and out of control. They intimidated the town board and the citizens. In short they behaved like criminals and thugs.
Eventually we were able to abolish the PD but not till after a civil war.
Again and again, the individual must enforce civility in a society through morality. Government does not give a damn in its drive for power, always dividing, always encouraging immorality .
The Deep State is integral to all the immoral attributes in the country, concentrated mostly in the cities.
You are so right. Government only cares about one things besides power- MONEY. I see it constantly where I live in small town NY.
They collect many, many millions from us in property and other taxes, yet a struggling small business owner with a deli can't borrow $50 grand so he can stay in business till the summer.
I am so sick and tired of the goddamn politicians who get elected with their BS promises to help the tax slaves. I can't find even ONE OF THEM who will help me find government money for the business owner.
They are disgusting. By the way- the Republicans are 1000 times worse than the Dems. in this regard.
Me too @Kathy and @NY Nanny.
GO ICE!!!!
Thanks for being open minded. I'm no fan of lesbians but I'm also not a fan of the murdering of white women, even if they are lesbians. Interesting that the killer's wife is non-white and an immigrant. I like Trump but not as much as I previously did. I like MTG. She's against the Trump mRNA death shots. She would have picked Epstein for a pervert within a nanosecond like Secretary Lutnick, Epstein's former neighbor did, not have been his best buddy for years and never notice a thing. And she's MAGA not MIGA.
You will never agree with 100% of what a candidate or party says. If that happened across the board, the country would be as divided as DC is.
We are getting there, thanks mostly to the press.
Just read an excellent essay from American Thinker that is extremely thought provoking:
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/01/two_tons_versus_two_hundred_pounds.html
You need to be put in the same exact situation as that ICE officer, then see what YOU do. If you were intelligent, you would do what he did. If you are a brainwashed leftist moron, you would get run over.
You made a typical leftist diatribe--perverting the facts to fit your sick narrative. In most conservative states the level of threat that justifies the use of lethal force is:
If a victim reasonably feels that he or she is in danger of imminent danger of serious personal injury or death from an assailant, the victim may use deadly force to defend himself or herself. Good was in no danger of sustaining serious injury or death from the ICE officer(s) UNTIL she attempted to commit vehicular assault against the ICE agent. The ICE officer absolutely WAS at risk of imminent serious personal injury or death from Good when she drove toward him (and did hit him). He was fully justified in killing her. Leftists are trying to make Good into a martyr for "dying for the cause." Good was a moron who physically assaulted a law enforcement officer doing his sworn duty to enforce the law, and Good got herself killed as result.
Mr. Freedom, you said it much better than I could have---Thank you.
Awake not woke had his head up his rear and is definitely not looking at the facts or accepting of the fact that when a LEO tells you to sit down and shut up or.....get out of your car, that is what you do. Her death is exactly what her instructors wanted to happen so they would then be able to try to get sympathy for their unjust cause. Her instructors are the ones that should be indicted, not the guy who is trying to protect us from the criminal invaders.
I'm very, very pro-white. You're on the left. You are a communist. You identify with the killer because his wife is non-white and because the dead woman's white.
I think many of us here are more concerned about culture, order and spirituality than skin color.
If an officer pulls you over, it’s SOP to turn of the ignition and keep your hands in sight, NOT to start maneuvering wildly to the point you impact one of them or another pedestrian.
Given the current ideological climate, I would half expect a vehicle stopped in that location to be a possible car bomb.
Yep, stop, hands where the cop can see them, respect, tell them if you are carrying, do not talk, listen.
Yeah, race is just skin color. You are as wrong as he is.
No, he's as wrong as you are. The dead woman was white and, notwithstanding that she was a lesbian, was reportedly a Christian. If she had been from the middle east and of a different religion then she would be a hero to you.
Can't help but wonder, if you were the one standing in front of the vehicle about to be run down, if you would have all these opinions ,the man was hit a few months ago and drug and required stitches. that's all I need to know, this woman disobeyed lawful commands ,therefore she got herself killed, nothing to see here, I refuse to Pretend This is a tragedy, it is not, this is a stupid idiot, that played a dumbass game and won the grand prize. I do not believe the world is any poorer because she is no longer in it .I have no sympathy for brain dead morons that place themselves in positions in which they can get killed for no good reason, the woman was an idiot, now there's one less idiot on the planet, not celebrating just stating the facts. She decided to go there therefore she is fully responsible for everything that occurred to her. Nothing else to see here
agree, but just to note, the past tense of drag is dragged
I skipped 4th period English class all through High School. I guess it shows😅
Maybe the first time in her life she had to face consequences for her actions. Women and accountability are oil and water.
Amend that to "woke women"and I'd agree!
All women save the very spiritually developed. You were made to serve since you can't stand being independent - which means being accountable.
Not a few men are like this too of course. As Aristotle said, born slaves.
Just the previous day in that same city......this very thing with Renee Good happened....to another person involved with ICE agents. Months earlier the ICE agent involved took 33 stitches in a similiar incident with a vehicle. This was on the minds of these ICE agents. Renee Good should have gotten outta the vehicle and really should have "observed" from the sidewalk like everyone else. Classic case of FAFO.
The previous day in Minneapolis, a Cuban illegal immigrant used his vehicle as a weapon. It ended with his vehicle crashing and everyone luckily was not killed....though some minor injuries. The Cuban was arrested and will be deported. This is what was in the minds of the ICE agents commanding Renee Good to get the fuck outta the vehicle.
All your second guessing from a few thousand miles away means nothing.
The video clearly shows her tires spinning as she gunned the Honda. If the street had been cleared or dry, she would have flattened him.
See my comment on how a prosecutor / civil plaintiff would dismantle that argument.
From @dk above. Look at this guys (4) pictures that explain it all.
Brilliant!
https://open.substack.com/pub/shipwreckedcrew/p/minneapolis-is-not-even-a-close-call?r=1fxdc&utm_medium=ios&shareImageVariant=overlay
A cut and dry case of FAFO
I am quite sure they could do no such thing.
Try a point by point rebuttal.
Let's not and say we did.
The officer did not step in front of Good, when she reversed the car the front of the car turned directly at him. You can see it through the windshield. Her partner was starting to open the passenger door, it is not clear what happened to her. After stopping in reverse with the car aimed at the officer, she put it into drive and started to come forward. If I was the officer standing off to the side and the car suddenly reversed and faced me I too would wonder wtf.
From @dk above:
https://open.substack.com/pub/shipwreckedcrew/p/minneapolis-is-not-even-a-close-call?r=1fxdc&utm_medium=ios&shareImageVariant=overlay
Everything explained in (4) clear pictures.
This is a cut a dry case. She FAFO.
That should be FAFOed.
Oh please. A car hitting you at a mere 3 miles an hour can break bones depending on how it hits.
She was also ordered to get out of the car. She disobeyed that order. She’s already in trouble at that point, resisting arrest. Your friend is just plain wrong.
Dream on. I'll believe it when I see it. It was too late years, maybe decades ago.
It’s just beginning
This whole tragedy seems rather effective at taking the focus away from the unbelievable multi billion dollar state fraud?
It would be even more “effective“ if it could incite another George Floyd protest…
" Half the women in this country look like they could be harpooneers on the whaler Pequod." This is the most honest take of women who get tattoos. Its disgusting. I hope I live long enough to see these women at 70. They will appear as bruised bananas; their overpriced detailed body artwork diminished to blurry, unrecognizable stains.
I tried telling that to my daughter, as she continued to cover her body in tattoos.
It makes me sick seeing the beautiful child that came out of my body, now covered in tattoos!
So often, I see females at gatherings who have on beautiful dresses, their hair and make-up done just right, and ugly, gross tattoos covering their arms. The tattoos make all the rest of the beauty disappear!
I read once that women tattoo themselves and pierce their faces because they hate themselves and this act is some kind of subconscious act of self punishment.
I was in the grocery store this weekend and I needed help finding a certain product. I approached an employee of the store, a young woman, probably in her early twenties. a white girl. When she turned to face me after I called out to her what I saw was a fairly attractive young woman with dark hair and pale skin. Then I looked at her face. In her nose and lips were at least 6 studs and piercings. I looked at her face. She made eye contact with me, caught me gawking at her self mutilation, and she looked down. She never made eye contact with me again during our interaction. Her voice was muted as if she was afraid to talk. This girl was a total loser. I could tell the moment she avoided making eye contact with me. It broke my heart. I wanted to tell her in the kindest way possible that she was a beautiful girl and to take those awful metal railroad spikes out of her nose and her face and embrace her feminine beauty. I didn't. Once she had found my desired product she skulked away and disappear around the corner of the aisle to hide until her next dreaded customer interaction.
Self hatred. It's the only reason that makes any sense as to why women, young women especially, do this to themselves.
Tattoos remind me of graffiti on the side of unused railroad cars. And, to be honest, I find I am seeing more and more tattoos on women than on men.
You should go back to the store and find her & some excuse to talk to her and say what you wanted to say. It sounds like she regrets what she did to herself (likely at a time of emotional distress).
Meh. She'd just tell me to go to hell or mind my own business. I'm just a tired old white dude. What do I know?
You don’t know that. You may be the supportive grandfather figure she never had or the alternative to the actual sexual or physical abuser that she actually had to endure. If you decide to do it, be sure to bring your wife along or someone who looks like she could be your wife.
Perhaps, but I in reality I am quite a timid soul who tries really hard to leave people alone. In return I just want them to leave me alone. This girl went to work to do a job, she probably wouldn't like having some stranger tell her how to live her life. So, I demure from telling her what a loving parent should have told her many times before.
Brilliantly written Cankerpuss, my friend
I look at those wonderful pictures of my beautiful 40-year-old daughter.
A Professor of Medicine at WI University now.
And wonder if she would have achieved her current position with "metal railroad spikes out of her nose and face" and her arms covered in tattoo's.
We all know the answer to this, eh?
And she's probably quite satisfied in the life she has chosen and worked to achieve. Good for her. Wish I could say the same thing about my oldest daughter.
That girl perhaps had a parent whom she thought did not approve of her. She was getting back. Love and hugs with warm affectionate reassurances from parents can help prevent this in our children.
"Self hatred. It's the only reason that makes any sense as to why women, young women especially, do this to themselves." Possibly self loathing, but definitely a harbinger of Low IQ and/or a high dose of sociopathy.
Tattoos = No empathy for ones own future
If one does not have empathy for ones own future then what chance any empathy for others now or in the future.
Tattoos = Self ID'ing of sociopathy.
Makes sense. Interesting way to look at Tattoos.
Just today I was at the gym and a relatively attractive young woman came in to use the weights nearby where I was working out. I kid you not, the woman had a tattoo on her face, surrounding her left eye that resembled the facial tattoo on Mike Tyson.
So bizarre.
Oh and I might add that I would not be surprised if it was found that there is a disproportionate number of people with tatts that attended child care compared to those whom did not.
Child Care facilities are sociopath factories.
Yes, I am positing a direct relationship in the ruinous breakdowns of western societies with the advent of child care.
It shows that they are "cool" Cool means respectable now. It used to mean being a rebel, but the rebels won.
Keith Richard exploded when Mick accepted Knighthood from the Queen. Mick explained to him: It means that we've won. Keith was clinging to a now imaginary outlaw stance.
It's self-mutilation
It’s human graffiti. I was at a spa the other day and there was a young woman there with a perfect swimsuit model figure covered head to foot in tattoos. Why? I had the same reaction when going to Rome or Paris and seeing ugly idiotic graffiti on a centuries old architecturally beautiful building.
They are showing their loyalty as servants of the Deep Ones.
It’s a result of low self-esteem.
IDK its a mind virus. The other issue no one talks about, is the slow, progressive immune dysregulation caused by having a foreign substance in the largest organ of the human body (skin). Of course our $ick care $ystem loves tattoos and will never mention the long term health consequences. Until you consider everything offered and condoned by the main stream as threats to your life/health, you open the door to become a victim/paying sick care customer.
Exactly! The slow leaching of the dyes through the skin and into the bloodstream is a continuous poisoning.
Yes, I couldn't agree more with the comments here. Over the decades, I've been bullied by tattoo artists that I know to succumb to their 'body art'. No way! I would never in my wildest dreams think of defacing the beautiful skin that God gave me. I've earned every gray hair and wrinkle on my body and they are my crown of glory! I was knit perfectly in my mother's womb.
And the financial resources they dump into the tattoos is staggering as well.
God help them when they need MRIs as they get older. Won’t be an option.
Not true my friend. Sorry
MRI's are not bothered by tats
But maybe MRI's bother tattoos. 🤔
I dunno!
Dennis likes tattoos. What other bad things does he like?
Fuck off Lugh. You clown.
I do not like tattoos
And another bad thing I don't like is snarly posters
Trying to shit on your character!
I assumed you were talking about the mRNA injections…!
Their daughters will definitely let them know how ugly those tattoos look when they’re about 13, or maybe that was just my daughter. 😂
😆 🤣
They are crying out for parental love and guidance, with more hugs and assurances from a loving parent. That is always needed to prevent a feeling of low self esteem.
Or maybe they are defiant girls trying to piss off their parents for not letting them do everything they wanted to do.
For sure there are children who will defy parents, and the foot needs to go down. Within a short time, the parents must be the
In my experience, no one is more brutal to a woman’s self confidence than a teenage daughter.
That’s my experience too!
To a mothers patients!
The tattoo generation has become the embodiment of the Carny at any county or state fair. The guys all want to pretend masculinity by resembling Japaneses and Chinese gangsters. It's all so pathetic.
Some combat troops get them because a) they want to appear ferocious and b) the tattoos can be used to identify them if they're killed.
a) I get that
b) same here
What I don't get is the penchant for large and/or full body tattooing.
One will do, say the Marine Tattoo. A thing of justified pride.
I was watching an Al Jazeera documentary on a high-security prison, Cosmo.
Was it in Indonesia??
Every inch of every violent inmate's body was covered in tats.
Gruesome........wasted lives from the get-go!
I have been a life long weight trainer and amateur body builder. I spend a lot of time at the local gym trying desperately to maintain that muscle mass (as I age it is getting harder and harder to do) and I always enjoy being among the younger people there and partaking of the positive energy that is so prevalent in these places. I see some amazing physical forms there in. Male and female. What always chagrins me is when I see a young body builder of female or male persuasions and that beautiful body they are working so hard to build and chisel is covered with tattoos. I can't see the delineation of the muscles because the muscles are covered by ugly graffiti-like tattoos. One day, I am going to approach one of these individuals, tap them on the shoulder and explain to them that they are obscuring the very thing they are trying to improve. One day....
Have you tried supplements? Or even just a higher protein diet?
Do it Cank...life is short, my man!
Many thanks Shiela. Finally a sane word about tattoos.
Expensive tattoos…soaking up luxury poverty money from women (and men) who have no families to support so become spendthrifts on body art. And women are walking away in droves from their partners and children. This couple pretty much illustrates one of the major crisis points in our
culture.
And my 30-something daughter is caught up in this swirl of drain-circling but I’m not allowed to say a peep about it lest I be labeled with brain-dead names. I mourn quietly and see no grandchildren in my future.
I told my errant daughter to stop acting like her boyfriend's unpaid whore and demand more from him, to get married. She hasn't spoken to me for 4 years. How dare I attempt to get this stupid girl to demand more from her man and to have a little self respect.
The man would be a fool to marry a girl like this, right?
"Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?"
Girls go to college happy and wanting to build futures, and come back obese and sterilized, dressing like men while hating them, despising God, loathing everyone and everything, covered in piercings and tattoos -- and in many cases their mothers think this is fine. Why, "there's nothing wrong with Buffy! She's just finding her way! How dare you say anything?! You're not supportive. You don't love our daughter, and you obviously don't love me either, you male chauvinist bastard!"
Yes, UncleBob, you hit the nail right on the head with this one.
My oldest daughter, 25, raised in a christian and religious home, was taught to avoid tattoos, alcohol and to get married before having children. The moment she left home she started sleeping around with various men and boozing it up.
She now has two children, no education and is living with a man who can't be bothered to put a ring on her finger and commit to her. He drives a truck, she works at UPS. They have no money, or so they claim, but they always seem to have money for booze and tattoos. Or, at least, credit cards.
This was a girl who was raised to NOT engage in this kind of a lifestyle.
American women are bat shit crazy. It doesn't surprise me at all that young men have no interest in this and would rather jerk off to AI porn these days. Not that that does them any good either. Porn is as addictive and mind numbing as alcohol.
Yeah Cankerpuss, there's always money for booze, cigarettes, tatts, weed, and lottery tickets lol.
The ones that get me are the ones always begging me for a $20 "loan" (yeah right!) "because I just need a little gas money please Dennis."
Standing at my door stinking to high-heaven of Tobacco.
In NZ, the gubmint, trying to quell smoking by young people, has put HUGE taxes on tobacco and fags. That little pouch of backy is NZ$85 I think! No shit!
Does it do any good? I dunno.
The Nazis preached abstinence, hiking, marching, martial arts, etc. The first duty of a National Socialist is to be beautiful.
Yeah, but porn has a certain feel to it...
What do you mean?
Sorry, I should have said climax.
So sorry. When they do the typical rebellious breakaway from parental control, that is the exact time they need warm hugs and reassurances of love and support while teaching them about higher standards.
You took your eyes & wisdom off of her for the few seconds it took for her rebellion! You can’t start parenting in the middle….must be always and forever! Children slip away in the bat-of- an eye! I feel for you!
It can happen very quickly. Many sent their daughter off to college and never saw her again if they took women's studies or just started going to the women's center. It's not just a small Cult, but an international one of vast wealth and power.
I'm so sorry, my man!
'One huge cia op' another installment in the series
[CIA agents are tight-lipped, but Steinem spoke openly about her relationship to The Agency in the 1950s and ’60s after a magazine revealed her employment by a CIA front organization, the Independent Research Service.]
source:
https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/feminist-was-spy
Childless & unmarried, Steinem refused to put anything about family and children in the Equal Rights Amendment which Betty Friedan, a mother of 3 had requested….Steinem is bitter & evil yet young women glorify her.
What gets me is how easily the majority of men take on the leash.
The nose rings or coke carbs a small earring in the side of the nose, I find very repulsive.
Does snot shoot out of the little hole when you blow your nose?
Is the bull ring so your boyfriend or girlfriend can tie you down at night or lead you around BY THE NOSE?
Asking for a friend.
The piercing I find most odd is the huge gauge stud these girls put through their tongues. I saw one girl who had one so large she couldn't shut her mouth. Of course, she was obese, had purple hair and was covered with tattoos.
Or the damn earlobe holes that some stretch until they tear, and it costs them five grand to get it fixed.
I suspect it is to make themselves stand out, but since all the younger kids are doing this, not modifying yourself makes you stand out far more.
I always chuckle at the dudes and girls who take the little discs out. They are left with this stringy floppy thing under their earlobes dangling down to their shoulders.
Ben and Cankerpuss
As a young hippy at University in NZ in...1968...oh dear! I am fuckin old!
I had my long blond hair down to my arse, and one pierced earring.
Cool huh! Flower Power baby!
One day I was combing my magnificent long locks and ripped that loop earring clean out! Ouch ..fuckin hell ~ lots of blood and screaming!
Continuing this story......
I married a gorgeous tall CA girl in Wellington NZ. Oh man!!!!!!! ( My redneck NZ Dad reckoned my dick was a larger part of my brain..and "why don't you get your fuckin nose pierced then!") LOL
My new bride suggested that if we go to Murica, and meet her Dad, best I get a haircut. I cut it off, and we sold the locks to a wig maker.
Anne showed her Dad a photo of his new son-in-law. She told me many years later that he said.."Jeez honey, his hair is pretty long eh!" LOL
We flew to Arkadelphia, Arkansas...Holy cow..talk about culture shock!
"Where you from honey? .."uuh, I'm from New Zealand"
"That's nice. We got a boy at the local University who is from Saudi Arabia too" WTF! LOL
Then my new Father-in-law took me to his Lions Club meeting for lunch. And I got to find out why all the University grid iron team is black guys.......you don't want to know! LOL
Dad wanted to buy us a new car for a wedding present. We went car shopping in Littlerock. The Buick salesman pulled me aside...."Son, you know that this car was made right here in St Louis!" hahaha... we bought a Chevy Vega (US$2,999) instead of the new Ford Pinto with the exploding gas tank. And drove to the HEPUSEF gas station to fill up at 40cents per gallon. And set out on I40 to LA ~ right in the middle of the 73-74 gas crisis and Tricky Dicky deciding to resign! "I am not a crook!" What a country eh!
End of story:
We repaired my pierced ear hole. New diamond stud! LOL
Only to find out in Murica it was in the wrong side! I was a homo! LOL
BTW, the NZ Māori call a queer......wait for it...... a "shirt lifter!" LOL
Has the Meds Cart arrived yet?
EDIT: Salesman: Its $2,999. Me: OK we will take it! Poor old Dad nearly had a heart attack about his new son-in-law. Fuck, this moron my daughter picked does not even know how to barter the price down! (In NZ you had to wait for months and then pay the dealer under the table to get a new car! LOL)
Thanks for the share, I enjoyed reading that.
My white South African friend calls queers "clay pot merchants."
I never bothered to ask why.
All nose jewelry is a stupid idea. Nobody’s nose is the most attractive part of their face, so why draw attention to it?
An indecipherable smudge.
My friend's grandmother warned her against getting a tattoo. She told her that "by my age, that rose will be a rose garden."
Very well put. And, while we're at it, can we make a conscious effort to reject the emotivism that brought us same-sex "marriage." For example, we might say, "the woman she thought she was married to," instead of acquiescing to the foolishness and referring to her as "her wife."
I just threw up a little in my mouth!
...and the other half look like they could be the TARGET of a harpooner on the whaler Pequod."
LOL
Female here and I agree. A small motif here or there can be decorative but these crazies are just, as my Daddy said: “showing their asses.” I know they do that, too, but his meaning was making fools of themselves. Tiny glittering rhinestones in the fool’s gold crown of colossal ignorance, to paraphrase Rush.
Who’s going to be a sex object at 70? You guys sound like a bunch of snobs.
Yes I am an anti tattoo snob. My point is that tattoos at 18 and up makes a "sex object" woman look like garbage. There are no sexy women with tattoos. Damaged goods.
On the plus side the fact that people like you still exist is a hopeful sign for the future of punk and metal 🤘
Cluster B's generally don't make it to 70.
Yes, many people don't realize that tats don't retain their original pristine look as they age.
Heh... I like girls with tattoos, but that "bruised bananas" line was savage. Take your heart, thief.
What is the attraction to having body piercing or extensive tattoos (not cheap)? If this attracts men to women, who is it they're attracting?
The ink within the skin is likely absorbed incrementally into the body. What's the body doing with it? Stuff that's supposedly 'inert' can become local irritants and a nidus for cancer to develop. When you're young, you don't worry about appearance in the future (if they make it to 70). Oh well, the price they pay for being 'stylish'.
All that ink, and the mysterious cocktail of chemicals within it, are going to infuse through the skin into the bloodstream, nice and gradually. A few moons later, a very unfortunate reaction might occur.
COPILOT: "Tattoo ink is generally considered safe when applied by licensed professionals, but it is not biologically inert—pigments can migrate from the skin into the lymph nodes and bloodstream, where they interact with the immune system. While most people experience no serious health effects, research shows that tattoo inks may contain heavy metals, preservatives, or nanoparticles that raise long-term safety questions."
Please share all your credible researched sources as to how the physical system deals with this and exactly what is in all these 'inks'. It would be helpful to have that ammunition for the readers of this to supply that information to those they hope to dissuade from getting tattoos.
I only have anecdotal professional experience of over 40 years to support my observations. If that information is out there we should share.
These people don't consider the consequences of their actions today. They "live in the now" and they'll deal with those consequences when they happen. At least that is what my daughter told me.
HAHAHA ‼️😂
So true!
i can't believe these women give two hoots about "immigrants" -- they just want to "stick it to Trump" who is the ultimate masculine authority figure these. they have daddy issues.
One hundred percent on the daddy issues.
They have daddy issues because men aren't permitted to be real daddies anymore. It also doesn't help that women screw whatever "man" will have them, get pregnant, have the baby and the man that screwed them is long gone.
Don't blame this on Dads. I know a lot of men who mourn their children because their wives divorced them and then poisoned the minds of their children against their fathers.
Yes, the almost invariable slandering of the ex. Women's darkest nature revealed. But there is more, much more. We know because women use the internet as the diary now. Many women are enraged when their husband gets sick. They can't stand to see him take a nap or sleep in. He's no better than a broken appliance! And yes, they don't like to see him having a good time with his friends, assuming he still has any.
The pundits of the Men's Movement estimate that perhaps 10% of women have the capacity to see men as human beings, as an end in themselves and not just servants or slaves. Just things to be used and abandoned.
Paychecks. Nothing more.
One more, the narcissism of females today is growing. Simple, they are incapable of sharing themselves with a family, a man, children. Pregnancy is a bitch, childbirth is shattering. Can you imagine any of these Karens putting having a baby as worth sacrificing themselves for? No way. Why does it seem to be increasing? ????
And abortion today has become a means of birth control. Unfortunately, many women who have abortions as a means of birth control live the rest of their lives with feelings of guilt for these actions.
Jeez Cank! Here we go again! Leave it alone eh!
Enough preaching...you are not good at it! LOL
I'm not arguing or stating otherwise the merits of abortion, DM, just stating that many women today use it as a means of birth control. Now I know that a smart dude like you can agree with that.
No, I am not a preacher. Just an old jack mormon with an opinion.
I have a 70-year-old aunt who had a couple of abortions, and she does regret them to this day.
Daddy (and mommy) issues are a huge part of the Cluster B pathology.
They are lashing out. They are pissed off because their lives are shit and they know it. Feminism has screwed these ladies and turned their minds into mush. They are living a monthly battle between biology and society. Biology is winning but the battle is getting ugly. The fairer sex ain't so fair anymore. No wonder men aren't interested.
Women, white women especially, are nature or God's penultimate creation. There is nothing more beautiful than a feminine self caring woman. I don't care if she is a little heavy or a little thin. All women have inherent beauty if they will just care for themselves and have self pride. Most men don't care if their women are a little heavy or a little thin, they just want a woman to love and a woman who will get naked with him. It's not that complicated.
We are enduring the results of a feminism and a feminized society. The roles of men and women are inside out, upside down. Nature will correct this in time. It has already begun.
I should also add, most normal men want a woman who will take care of herself, get naked with him, but also will have his children.
Watched an ad on the teevee a few days back with a dude meeting with his financial planner to plan a safari to africa. The wife says they can also plan for a "baby." The man says "babies" and the woman firmly states "BABY" in a corrective manner.
Men still want children. They want women. They want to love a woman.
Women don't want any of this anymore.
“It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies...” - George Orwell. 1984.
Apparently these women swallow their slogans with junk-food chasers.
Appreciate all the "likes", but now I have found another version of this quote with an added ending: ......."and nosers-out of unorthodoxy." Wonder what that refers to?
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy."
"In "1984," George Orwell's portrayal of women is multifaceted, encompassing both critical and sympathetic elements. While he often falls into misogynistic stereotypes, the characters of Julia and Katherine serve to highlight the oppressive nature of the Party and the potential for resistance. Orwell's work invites readers to reflect on the roles of women in society and the impact of totalitarianism on personal relationships, making it a significant topic for discussion in feminist literary criticism."
https://www.bing.com/search?q=women+in+1984+george+orwell&FORM=QSRE11
LOL...way above my paygrade....LOL
I watched a video this morning where a reporter asks Minneapolis protesters about the Somali fraud. Half of them didn't know anything about it, and the other half said it was BS based on racism. Leftists have become incapable of rational thought.
Also, thanks for the heads up on the Elon discovery. I hadn't heard that, but I'm willing to bet it's true.
What I have heard alleged is he sponsored some "Jack Ryan" type stuff to stop election fraud overseas. Perhaps in forty years someone will include it in their memoirs.
Not only that, when the info produced became known, there should have been an investigation of the 2020 election exposing the tools used to steal that election.
Never happen. It would take away tools from the election tool boxes of all the scum in the Deep State.
I believe it will happen. Trump has the motive, means, and opportunity to expose it all. He regularly talks about election fraud. He’s not going to let it go. He wants vindication.
I do hope you are right. The scum must be eliminated.
You think they'd rat out the fathers of their children?
It strikes me that the people who are attacking the ICE officers are bullies. They would never see themselves that way. But they are actually in a position of power. They can pretty much say and do what they want, but the officers can fight back in only the most limited of circumstances
and with only limited force. ICE are likely to get in serious legal trouble if they fight back at all - even if they use reasonable force in response, they face media attack, public attack, lawsuits, and prosecution by overzealous liberal prosecutors. The bullying dynamic is even more the case when these men are being attacked by women - most men have been socialized not to hit women, and it’s never a good look when a man is using force against a woman. Especially a man in law-enforcement/military garb. The woke establishment takes the side of the protesters reflexively. The bullies know all this and are emboldened by it.
But the “police” are Federalized in this situation…..can be pardoned, if need be, by PDJT immediately……correct me if I’m wrong!
Maybe, but think of this: Would you like to be ICE Officer Ross right now? I think he has been put into hiding for his own protection. From the bullies.
When I was a young boy I would do sleepovers at my cousins house, a brother and sister. He was one year older ,she one year younger. Unlike other cousins and friends I knew, these two hated each other. Not typical sibling rivalry , but hatred. I saw first hand why the brother hated her. She would literally smack herself hard enough to show, then go to her dad and say see what he did. He would then deny to no avail while receiving the business end of a belt. Horrified beyond belief I happened to catch a glance at her, and the look of satisfaction on her face I will never forget. It's the same look I'm witnessing now on every leftist who says murder. murder !
Good article James, but I disagree on one point. You write " Becca will have that on her conscience forever, alas." Perhaps a sliver of a guilty conscious may fleetingly arrive, but it will be drowned out by the accolades being parceled out by the woke folk. She's more likely thinking what a wonderful person she is .
My sister used to pull that "he hit me!" stunt...until my dad caught her doing it. What followed was the sweetest revenge I have ever known.
I had the same thing happen with my older sister. She had a temper and she was raging on me daring me to hit her. My Dad walked into the room the moment she was doing it. I expected my Dad to come down on me and much to my surprise he came down on my older sister. Hard. She never did that again.
My Dad was always very protective of his children, especially his sons. How I miss my father.
My younger sister, who I used to babysit with two other, younger siblings, tried to blackmail me when she was six, saying, "you better let us stay up or I'm going to tell Dad you were hitting us." So I let them stay up till my parents came home and explained the situation. Revenge is a dish best served cold, as they say.
Have to agree on Becca. Plus she stands to collect a cool million and a half from Go Fund Me in addition to whatever she can make as a paid spokesperson for chaos.
I had the same sort of sister, admitted to me years later. But remember, it is not the sister’s fault, she has learned to manipulate bad parentage to her benefit.
It never heals, the damage that it does.
Sad, but true!
And about where she’ll spend her “ inheritance “! Nasty pig-woman
I still can't imagine a real mother actually leaving her kids behind to serve a false political narrative. Creepy stuff.
My single nurse mother told me long ago that we should abolish the 19th amendment after the election of Jimmy Carter. I was very young, but eventually understood what she meant.
Crazy is as crazy does.
I can't believe some women intentionally make their children sick to gain the attention of others.
Or that some decide their kids need a sex change at an early age.
“Munchausens” and “Munchausens by Proxy”. Both devastatingly effective at warping lives.
Nailed it. They are a folies a deux x millions. Stepfordia. Cultists.
The first time they’ve felt like the “ in crowd”. Which makes them dangerous. They’ve never belonged. They were the ones who weren’t asked to the prom, asked out on a date, invited to parties, to sit at a lunch table, to join a team,participate in an event. They had no special attributes or talents, they went unnoticed or if noticed, with scorn or mockery. And now they’re getting even.
If those two are from Minnesota, they’re from the wrong side of the tracks, which isn’t saying much, given Minnesotans spend half their time holed up indoors because it’s too cold to be outside. They haven’t experienced the hustle bustle of NY, the sun and fun of Miami.. this is the high point of what is proving to be a short window that is their meager time on Earth.
Given Good’s history. Failed marriages, three children, two of which were abandoned, I’m guessing she slept with anybody who gave her the time of day. And was probably dumped the day following many times. I feel no pity for her. She didn’t care about her children. I don’t care about her. She was selfish.
Those (and more!) are modern maladaptations. They're the unintended consequences of tech and progress, and prioritizing the wants of the individual (not to forget the State and the Market!) over the basic needs of the species. Social experiments are failing right and left but instead of rolling a few things back and saying No once in a while everyone cries for moar. Moar, Baby! Moar, moar!
I’m a woman and I can see the benefit. These women and the damage they are doing to our great country is frightening.
I would declare the situation insanity and then try to figure out what is causing it.
Symptoms:
LBTGQ+ existence
Hatred of authority
Daddy problems
Military PTSD
Sports CTE
Genetic deterioration
Education by insane teachers
Non-caring parenting
Peer pressure by insane peers
Observing our governance and its insanity.
Note that most of the above are at the center of the Ult-Left’s agenda.
How about the 72 vaccine shots. The US vaccine schedule has tripled since 1986. When Kennedy and company recently brought the schedule in line with Denmark, Germany, and Japan, he was of course called a child killer. No mention of the fact that kids in those countries are routinely ranked as healthier than kids in the US.
Oh, Lisa, you are going to piss off a lot of folks with your common sense.
Don’t I know it!
Those 72 shots are being paired down still too many though.
Restricting able bodied people that suck off the taxpayers (for more than a few months max) from voting would go a long way in sorting things out.
Indeed. The richest counties in America surround Sodom on Potomac and 93% of the people there vote democrat.
Who can possibly know, understand, predict the psyche of women. More than permission, by which I assume he means "a meaning to life", I think it can happen to most Americans because we, society, are now fixated on politics. It replaced religion, relationships, community, social circles, clubs. It creates and validates right and wrong. It overrides reality and creates its own. All laws and justice are administered in relation to political party. Our entertainment complies with political trends and agendas. Sex is political. We are a giant Jim Jones Kool Aid chugging party. Welcome to the warmth of collective insanity. Drink up ladies.
Who knows? Other women do. But we're traitors and obstructions to the feminist "equality" cause.
Women used to be an anchor for society, helping to stabilize the insanity of men.
Thank you feminist movement, you have done away with much of that, equating men’s insanity onto the “new woman”.
Look around to see the results, instead of stabilizing things, the feminists have jumped right into the insanity pool.
One of the main tenets of modern feminism is that in order to be free and equal, women must behave like men. Against their natures and bodily limits. It ain't workin' out.
No, its not and nature is going to reclaim everything and make it back to what it should be. Women are baby factories. That is the entire nature of their creation. Incubators. Food factories. All for children. They are reminded this on a monthly basis when the cramps and menstrual cycles hit. Biology doesn't care about careers or degrees.
Men and women are different between the ears. Women trying to be men are causing insanity?
Or women being constantly told they should be ashamed of themselves for trying to be real women.
By other women!
I kid my wife about women competing against themselves with appearance. Entire industries exist to support women trying to outdo other women.
High heels, especially spikes, cosmetics, nude dresses, crazy hairstyles, mutilating and dangerous plastic surgery, and maybe even tats and piercings.
Correct me if I am wrong. Mother Nature insists that women do this stuff to be attractive to and seduce men, and men are the aggressive folks that allow themselves to be seduced, willingly. Hormones are a bitch.
I am a woman who regrets that women have the right to vote, which gets me in trouble every time I say it. Politically, women are extremophiles: the nost radical group demographically are single, childless women, and the most conservative are married women with children.
This is a topic that makes me very sad. Men and women are natural allies and there is so much effort to separate us. Women are socialized to view men as if they are wayward, misbehaving women who need to be lectured and scolded back into proper behavior. And porn wires the male brain to see real women as sexualized, defective appliances. This is an unhappy state of affairs for everyone involved, and most of all for the children, increasingly rare, born of such union.
Fertility and fecundity in the west are in freefall, and most countries of the west have fallen over the demographic cliff, the point beyond which populations do not generally recover. Our leaders have flooded western countries with replacements, who do reproducce, ensuring civil war for all of us sooner or later. The west needs traditional women, mothers, desperately. We need traditional men, warriors, desperately. And it needs people passionately devoted to parenthood.
Whenever I look at homes for sale, I laugh at the fancy signs, in beautiful cursive, in the laundry that say "Laundry", the farmhouses with signs that say "Farmhouse", the kitchens with signs that say "Eat." I keep waiting for the sign above the marital bed that says (I feel olite this morning) "Procreate." Still waiting.
In any western country that survives this, or more accurately, any village, the old ways are coming back.
Wow. What a post! Fantastic. You sound like my wife, Gwennie. I bet you are a total babe as well. Thank you for putting up that fantastic comment. This is sincere, no sarcasm intended.
My wife doesn't want to vote. She always asks me who to vote for. I tell her to vote for who she wants and she insists on voting for who I vote for. Love that girl!
My wife of 49-years always asked me who I was voting for.
Then she voted for the other guy! No Shit! Every time! LOL
Tell us more. Sounds like you have a terrible wife.
I've reported your ass, Lugh.
For stalking other posters and shitting on them!
A sure sign of a low self-esteem.
Look who's talking! Your disrespect for religious people has been off the charts. Report yourself.
As I have thought before, you my friend are not the sharpest knife in the drawer. I do not disrespect religious people.
I merely ask questions of their Christian religion.
I don't mock people for being religious. I do however mock those for thinking their personal religion is exempt from mockery. Nothing is so sacred that it cannot be mocked. Religions deserve to be mocked.
An all-mighty God that is hurt by being mocked is not all that powerful
"Ridicule is the only weapon to be used against unintelligible religious propositions."-Thomas Jefferson,
--------
The Bible was written, revised and edited many times by the religious for the religious. The last thing it is, is truthful, reliable, unbiased, impartial or a neutral source. Folks that belief the entirety of Bible are willing to sacrifice their humanity on the altar of a book that they can't even prove.
Created sick and commanded to be well. The Christian believe that God made us imperfect and punishes us if we don’t get well. Commanded to love someone you fear. The very essence of sadomasochism. Showing everything that is so sick about Christian beliefs.
The stories in these old books made the Church rich. While the truth lay outside of all of them. To be fooled is not an insult, to stay in the foolery is an insult to oneself.
There are but two reasons for worshiping a God. The hope it can do something FOR you. And the constant fear it can and will do something TO you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZW141pJ1gE
Having access to God doesn't mean having access to reality. If God creates souls he knows are damned to hell that means he's a total POS. And it makes you a POS if you believe in that!
---------
Everyone is born atheist. Religion has to be taught. Atheism doesn't have to be taught. Atheism is the only true default position when it comes to the question of 'God'. The only way to prove atheism wrong is by proving that a 'God' exists.
Atheists don't tell theists that they will be eternally tortured for their beliefs. Who's being more vitriolic?
The most vitriolic atheist doesn't hold a candle to theists who murder or even subjugate in the name of their god.
We all know that the ONLY one that could possibly prove God's existence to EVERYONE is God himself. If he's there he's hiding and doesn't want us to know him or him us. That's all I need to be convinced that the God of the Bible does not exist. The simple, honest, inevitable conclusion for any honest and unbiased thinker.
-------
God picked this version of the universe, and he will burn you forever because he loves you so much, after creating you to not believe. Yeah, makes sense...!
If God knew his creations would end up being tortured why create us?
Weird how any real "God" would still remain hidden after 1000's of years from mortals he demands worship from.
Christians: "Jesus loves you". Me: "Why did he tell you?"
I love the "you need to be looking for him" stuff. Quick question: "Why?" Christians really don't understand this: I don't believe in God. I do not believe there is anything for me to be looking for. They think that because belief in their God is important to them, it should be important to me. It's really not.
"You Only Have Two Choices: Obey God Or Burn In Hell Forever!?" There are other options, such as don't obey and don't burn in hell cuz it doesn't exist.
---------
I learnt a long time ago that once theists are cornered, they like to end the conversation, so they don’t have to deal with the answers they don’t like. You have to deal with people of differing views; I can be less confrontational if you’d like to be less smug.
----------
“The achievements of theologians don’t do anything, don’t affect anything, don’t mean anything. What makes anyone think that ‘theology’ is a subject at all?” - Richard Dawkins.
For me, the bottom line is always Truth. The question must always be; "Is it True?" That is the only way to make the best choices for ourselves, as well as our society. Even the most inoffensive religious belief systems introduce unsupported claims and take us away from the path of Truth, robbing us of the ability to make the best decisions in our lives.
"At what point does all of this stuff just break down and become just a lot of stupid shit that someone made up! They fucking made it up folks! It's make-believe!” – George Carlin
Well I hope not. I like my vote and I don’t want to be classified as property. That said, there are a lot of stupid, fearful women out there.
Agree with all points, Thea.
Made me laugh…..we know what the sign above the bed says……😩😩headache!
Thank you,
“Charlie”.
The lack of critical thinking in these activists and the general public outraged by what happened amazes me.
Ask these same people if they think it would be a good idea to harass, threaten, and obstruct a police officer making an arrest for a DUI or shoplifting and they would most definitely say "of course not".
So why in the hell do these people think it's okay to do this to ICE agents arresting illegal aliens? These people are brainwashed. Our media is complicit in the brainwashing. And many of our politicians cynically use these folks as useful idiots in their games of power.
It's not complicated. These people are Communists and their Useful Idiots.
But the question remains, where did they come from? What has happened to the USA that has grown such insanity? What do these people, not just the leaders really want?
The answers to this have been discussed over and over on this blog. IMHO, three causes:
Lousy parenting
Lousy education
Invasion.
The KGB defector, Yuri Bezmenov (sp?) laid it all out. America was done, cooked, by the 80's. Demoralized with the kids educated by the deadly enemies of mankind: the Corporations and the International Bankers. These are backers of Communism if you did but know!
You forgot the government with the Department of Education. Look at NYC, certainly Communist but hardly run by corporations. The corporations are currently trying to figure out how to handle Mamdani.
Oh? Who gave him the money to run? Campaigns are very expensive. The great foundations give the money. But where do they get it from? See my post above.
??? Look and see who benefitted by his victory.
First on the list, IMHO, is the global socialists, with number one soldier, someone named Soros, same as the AG and judges in NYC. Until someone figures out how to stop this jerk, we will continue to decline.
Men have become reluctantly pussified, fear these “battle-axe” obese women, who tell their man when he’s “done” & for how long his punishment will last! Chastity belt and all….with nails in them😡! “ You’ll get laid when I say…..keep your greedy hands off my tattoo’d pudenda” “I’ll tell you when & how long”…..Do my tats make me look fat??? Or undesirable?? Next step is daring to defy legal orders from authority…..make themselves even less desirable and disgusting! I am disgusted with my own acquaintances that put me into their bunch by no fault of my own!
They should GET what they’re asking for…..a good ass kicking & an ass kicking!
PIGS!
Annette
The separation, hormone wise between men and women is not clear cut. It is actually a gradual spectrum with effeminate men and masculine women. Another complication is the personality defects of narcissism and power infects women as much as men. That is a new wrinkle to The Battle since feminism showed up.
The basic roles of men and women have been blurred so badly it is affecting the operations of sane society.
Whatever they are.
Number 1 and Number 3 for sure. Number 2 is more about indoctrination having replaced good education. The low IQ clowns posing as teachers waste time with moronic "social/emotional " cultural Marxist garbage instead of the three R's. I am continuously blown away at the idea our local schools supposedly spend $20-30K plus per student and few, as in like 10% can read at grade level. In Illinois they have once again lowered the standards while performance has dropped to negate their book keeping stunt. Most are innumerate as well.
In our local church schools, for a fraction of the public school cost, the children are usually reading and writing in kindergarten.
Most of these fantasy street fighters are veterans of many a demo. I suspect they are used to Minneapolis cops under orders to go lightly. They rely on the police's restraint.
But federal law enforcement officers are a different species. They don't take orders from Hizzhonor the Mayor. The ICE crew are used to dealing with seriously bad people: rapists, drug dealers, drunk truck drivers, murderers even. You block ICE personnel's way, they don't get the joke. Driving in their vicinity after you've been told to get out of the car triggers new rules.
Although I would very likely have detested Ms. Good if I met her, I am sorry her biography ended the way it did. She didn't earn three rounds to the head. But she was a classic example of that wheeze about bringing a knife to a gun fight.
And they aren’t just illegal aliens. There are some horrific criminals here. Why would these agitators protest this??
“ICE released a list this week detailing some of the most dangerous non-citizen criminals arrested during a major enforcement surge in Minnesota. The list includes individuals convicted of child rape, sexual assault of minors, sodomy, and multiple homicides, many of whom had final deportation orders dating back decades.”
https://open.substack.com/pub/thejefferymead/p/morning-briefing-sunday-january-11?r=1o2l6&utm_medium=ios&shareImageVariant=overlay
Why would Democrats advocate for the release of known serial pedophiles?
One thing I've noticed sifting through the cringe content pushed out on Netflix and Apple TV: There often seems to be a take-charge lesbian around to handle the stunts previously performed by a Schwarzenegger, Stallone, or Willis hero from the 80s or 90s. The don't have much muscle, but lots of mouth. And they're often shown kicking the crap out of fellows we know could snap them like twigs. Perhaps this is where these wretched wiccans get their delusions of invincibility.
…or a tiny Asian woman that knows a martial art that kicks all the asses of the men 3x her size. 🙄
I watched an episode of that nasty "Star Trek Discovery" show and it had an older tiny Asian woman as the starship captain. I ran with the premise until she was beating the hell out of 300 pound Klingon warriors. She barely weighing 100 pounds. I couldn't watch another second of that awful show.
I watched a John Wick movie where Hollywood got it right and matched a smaller woman up against John Wick. He beat the shit out of her. She tried to put up a fight but she had no strength against him.
I can't stand modern Hollwood movies.
This "power girl" nonsense ties in with general leftist premise of reality being based on feelings and desires rather than... reality.
There is a commercial on the TV that shows a Georgia Bulldog fan doing the Georgia bark when his nasty hag of a boss (a woman) sits her Georgia Bulldog mug down on the table. She is the stereotypical girl boss. Arrogant, ugly, smug and looks at her male employee who is just trying to have a little college banter like he is a daft idiot. I hate that commercial.
Makes men look like idiots and the woman like the power player. Perhaps in some situations but that certainly isn't the norm.
...as they float in the air in Crouching Tiger slo-mo mode. Lol!
You will move into the cultural Potemkin villages and be happy.
When systems rot this far, you don’t need tribunals or firing squads — the trash volunteers to take itself out.
Every mind-parasite program eventually pushes its own foot soldiers off the cliff.
Broken ideology = self-cleaning oven.
Soros (meme): "Some of you may die, but that's a price I'm willing to pay." 😂
A great cleansing is required to rid the body politic of this "bloodless coup" that's been going on for quite some time. Time to get back to baseline. What is baseline? Two sexes only, obey the law, respect your neighbor, seek decorum, etc... and here the corporations could be infinitely more responsible by leading with Goodwill, instead of trying to punish, profit and extract from those less fortunate, i.e. unilaterally lower interest card rates instead of waiting for the government to provide direction, stop with your disingenuous virtue signaling, etc. We're you morally bereft corporate leaders waiting for Trump to show you the way??
"American men are less and less good husband material — except at society’s tippy-top where they make obscene amounts of money in activities that are, frankly, pretty antisocial when you look hard — like, running monopolies, inducing the entire population into ill health, and selling out their country. "
A kid I went to high school with, who is, frankly, a moron, made millions of dollars buying the life insurance policies, for pennies on the dollar, from poor, sickly, down-on-their-luck people who are near death. He drives around in Ferraris and Lamborghinis and posts endlessly about living his "best life." He learned the scheme from a couple of Turkish immigrants who are now in prison. This is what "success" looks like in America today. Late stage capitalism.
Apt comment.
America's business climate is essentially groups of powerful companies making money from people with less money. And it's getting worse and worse with derivatives, capitalizations, funds buying scads of single-family homes. Grossly anti-human activities.
Once you see the matrix for what it is - people marketing to you to take your money - it's impossible to unsee.
"Once you see the matrix for what it is - people marketing to you to take your money - it's impossible to unsee." As scales fall from the eyes, the gained knowledge cannot be 'undone'.
Nothing moves in a straight line. We're ever closer to the 'what happens next' part.
"Very slowly, then all at once."
We're in for a hell of a year, it looks.
yes indeed!
That is unchecked capitalism, rd3. You take advantage of your neighbor.
I have a few insurance agents in my neighborhood and in my local church. They make a ton of money and they do very little work for that money. Once someone buys the insurance policy, a chunk of that monthly premium is pure profit for the agent. What does the agent do to earn that money. Not a goddamned thing. And when the time comes that the client needs the insurance they do all they can to weasle out of paying. I hate insurances and insurance brokers. They rank up there with lawyers, producers of nothing and takers of everything.
That's what American capitalism is. A scam. Taking advantage of one to pay another.
Ain't it great?
I've been in a two-year long battle with State Farm over my roof. I've had State Farm for almost 20 years with no claims. Then, when I did have a claim, they fought me. I had to hire an independent adjustor and pay him 35%. So, in the end, I had to come out of pocket for $10k, when if State Farm would have just paid me to begin with, they would have been out the same money, but I would have been made whole. Instead, they shafted me and I had to drain my reserves paying for it.
Mortgage Insurance.
The Bank has to perform due diligence...on the loan. Is that right? I dunno.
And in case they fuck up - YOU have to pay for Insurance coverage to cover THEIR ass!
Talk about a scam!
EDIT: Hey, my fellow posters...why does my typed post always get double spaced?
Try a different browser.
Insurance companies are in the financial investment business. They take your (our) money and invest it. When it comes to paying claims, they try for the least $$ outlay to settle. They make a settlement offer (always a low-ball) hoping people will just accept it, however grudgingly. The idea is to keep as much $$ as possible on their side of the ledger.
Fighting them (negotiating?) takes a lot of time and energy. The game is rigged in their favor, as you (we) are trying to maximize the settlement amount in the midst of the loss, while they are trying to keep their cost of doing business low.
They sit in their offices collecting a salary (label as player A). The insured is suffering a loss, expending time, energy and $$ attempting to be made whole (label as player B).. So... would you prefer to be player A or player B?
Yep, they aren't about insuring, they are about making money and lots of it. Just watch a little teevee. Most of the ads you will see are insurance companies. They blow tens of millions of dollars on advertising each year. Many football stadiums are named after insurance companies. Insurance companies sponsor college bowl games every year to the tune of millions and millions of dollars, such as the Allstate Sugar Bowl.
If they have the kind of money to pay millions to name bowl games and stadiums after their business they should be lowering insurance rates or be faster at settling claims. Insurance companies are as big a fraud as you are ever going to find and we are the suckers. They prey upon our fear of "what could happen" and use that fear to pad their own pockets.
Unchecked Capitalism at its best. Take advantage of your fellow man so you can get rich.
Thus the need for Government to step in stop such abuses. Thus National Socialism or Fascism. It's as simple as a+b=b+a.
I'm a small government person.
Problems (issues) arise over time when individuals become too comfortable in their 'space', whatever it might be for the individual.
Then greed and power raise their ugly heads. Government becomes a tool for satisfying greed and increasing power.
It is the up/down axis (up = freedom, down = oppression)
Jefferson wanted a reset every twenty years. Keep freedom, suppress oppression.
Most individuals want to be left alone to "pursue happiness". While they are busy living life and wanting to be free, they (we) lose sight of 'freedom isn't free' because it requires work and constant vigilance to suppress the oppressors.
Thus, government isn't the best answer because both sides begin using it to further their 'agenda', whatever the 'agenda' might be. At this point the revolution is needed, about every 20 years, which leads to the conclusion every generation needs to fight government 'creep and control' in order to truly remain free.
Pursue happiness? You mean make money by screwing people over? That's what happiness is to Capitalist man. I love Jeff but he sounds like Mao with this quote.
If that's the best we can do, far better to go back to the stability of Monarchy. Clawing your way to the top produces exactly the wrong mentality and skill set needed to rule well.
Can’t blame females on the left for becoming lesbians. Look at the males of the democrat party and we see not a huge selection of men to choose from. Gavin Newsom, Tim Walz, mayors of Minneapolis and New York city not to mention all the effeminate dweebs in the congress. If they took off their shirts they’d look like a bunch of ironing boards with nipples.
The democrat party is a matriarchal party led by crack pot females with effeminate males in tow.
"The democrat party is a matriarchal party led by crack pot females with effeminate males in tow."
Don't forget the low-IQ, criminal minorities. They rise to the top of party.